Reclaiming VR Design Authority: Deaf Signers Shaping Immersive Classrooms
Honorable MentionAuthors
Paper Title
Reclaiming VR Design Authority: Deaf Signers Shaping Immersive Classrooms
Publication Info
- Topic area: Deaf-centered virtual reality (VR) design for educational applications.
- Keywords: Deaf education, virtual reality, signer placement, accessibility, Deaf Tech, immersive learning, visual attention, cultural fit, participatory design, ASL.
Background and Problem
- Problem / challenge: Deaf students face persistent visual attention challenges in remote and online classrooms, having to split focus between signers and instructional materials. Existing VR solutions often retrofit hearing-centered designs, failing to address Deaf cultural and pedagogical needs.
- Significance: Addressing these challenges can improve learning outcomes, reduce cognitive fatigue, and align educational tools with Deaf cultural practices, enhancing equity in education.
- Motivation and related work: Prior research has explored VR for accessibility, including subtitling, captioning, and avatar-based sign language, but these efforts often center hearing norms. This study builds on Deaf Tech principles, emphasizing Deaf leadership and cultural alignment in VR design.
Solution
- Proposed approach: A VR classroom prototype featuring three signer placement modes—Corner, Parallel, and Transparent—designed and evaluated by a Deaf-led team.
- Novelty:
- Development of a VR prototype prioritizing Deaf cultural and pedagogical practices.
- Introduction of a five-dimension conceptual framework for evaluating signer placement: proximity, customizability, visual efficiency, cultural fit, and task flexibility.
- Reframing VR education as Deaf-centered, emphasizing Deaf epistemologies in design.
- Procedure and key techniques:
- Designed a 15-minute VR lecture on binary search with three signer placement modes: Corner, Parallel, and Transparent.
- Conducted a qualitative study with 12 Deaf participants using ASL, collecting data via semi-structured interviews and field notes.
- Analyzed participant feedback using Constructivist Grounded Theory to synthesize the five-dimension framework.
Results
- Concrete findings:
- VR reduced visual attention split, improved visibility, and minimized distractions.
- Participants valued flexibility in signer placement, with preferences varying by context.
- Transparent mode showed potential for reducing visual split but faced challenges with contrast and cultural familiarity.
- Advantage over baselines:
- Compared to traditional remote learning, VR centralized visual elements, reducing cognitive load and enhancing engagement.
- Unlike hearing-centered VR designs, this prototype aligned with Deaf cultural practices and pedagogical norms.
- Experiments / evaluation:
- Conducted with 12 Deaf participants fluent in ASL.
- Evaluated three signer placement modes (Corner, Parallel, Transparent) using qualitative feedback.
- Key metrics included visual comfort, cultural fit, and task adaptability.
- Limitations and future work:
- Hardware constraints, such as discomfort for users with hearing devices, and limited customization in the prototype.
- Study focused on U.S.-based ASL users; applicability to other sign languages and contexts remains to be explored.
- Future research should examine long-term classroom deployments, diverse subject areas, and quantitative learning outcomes.
Summary
This study presents a Deaf-led exploration of VR classrooms, focusing on signer placement to address visual attention challenges in Deaf education. Through participatory design, the authors developed and evaluated a prototype featuring three placement modes, introducing a five-dimension framework (proximity, customizability, visual efficiency, cultural fit, task flexibility) for Deaf-centered evaluation. Results highlight VR's potential to align with Deaf cultural practices, reduce cognitive load, and enhance learning experiences. Future work will address hardware limitations, expand to diverse contexts, and explore sustained classroom applications.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
No related papers with ≥60% similarity
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)