The Spin Doctor: Leveraging Insensitivity to Passive Rotational & Translational Gain For Unbounded Motion-Based VR Experiences

Motion Sickness & Passenger ExperienceImmersion & Presence Research

Research Background and Issues

  • Issues and Challenges: The authors observed that most studies on the perceptual thresholds of rotational gain and linear gain focus on active self-motion scenarios (where users control their own movement). However, there is a lack of research on passive self-motion scenarios (e.g., passengers' movement in cars or simulators). Users in passive motion scenarios may have lower sensitivity to motion changes, allowing virtual reality (VR) experience design to surpass the limitations of real physical motion.
  • Significance: Passive motion scenarios include simulators, passenger experiences in cars, and entertainment facilities. In these scenarios, users' physical motion is constrained, but perceptual manipulation techniques could potentially expand the user experience. From a design perspective, this could significantly enhance the applicability and user experience of VR applications.
  • Research Motivation and Related Work: Motion gains (e.g., rotational gain) in passive motion scenarios have not been systematically explored, and traditional guidelines or thresholds are not applicable to these scenarios. This research aims to fill this knowledge gap and explore how to design "boundary-free" VR experiences.

Solution

  • Methods and Innovations:

    • Proposed a method to extend the experience of passive motion scenarios using perceptual manipulation techniques (rotational gain, translational gain, and opposing virtual-physical motion).
    • Designed three studies to measure perceptual thresholds, comfort thresholds, and the application of rotational gain in real vehicles.
    • The first study identified the minimum perceptible threshold and maximum comfort threshold for rotational gain, enabling designers to decouple real and virtual experiences.
    • The second study examined the impact of tasks on these thresholds, as well as the acceptability and perception of opposing motions.
    • The third study applied the findings to design an in-vehicle VR experience, creating virtual paths entirely different from real physical motion by adjusting gains.
  • Implementation Steps and Key Techniques:

    • Experimental Methods: Used the Method of Adjustment (MoA) and Staircase Method to measure thresholds related to rotational gain.
    • Scenario Testing: Tested the effects of perceptual manipulation techniques on a rotating chair and in a moving car.
    • Multi-task Evaluation: Investigated the impact of tasks (e.g., shooting games) on users' perception of virtual motion.
    • Application Design: Conducted experiments on the integration of multi-layer gains (including rotational and linear gains) to validate the feasibility of "boundary-free" virtual experiences.

Research Outcomes

  • Specific Findings:

    • In the rotating chair experiment, the minimum perceptible rotational gain for users was 4.5x, while the maximum comfort threshold was 12-17x, significantly higher than the 1.2-4x range in active motion scenarios.
    • Users in passive motion scenarios exhibited lower sensitivity to the blending of virtual and real motion, especially when engaged in tasks, with approximately 9% of opposing motion tests correctly identified.
    • Participants were more sensitive to faster motions and larger rotational angles, but linear gain in vehicle scenarios reduced the perception of rotational gain, thereby enhancing immersion.
  • Advantages and Impact:

    • Compared to existing solutions, the study demonstrates that manipulation techniques in passive motion scenarios are more effective than in active motion scenarios. Developers can significantly enhance virtual motion paths in passive VR experiences without compromising comfort or immersion.
    • In in-vehicle scenarios, combining linear and rotational gains effectively creates "boundary-free" virtual experiences that differ from real physical paths.
  • Limitations and Future Directions:

    • Limitations include focusing only on single-axis rotation (yaw axis) and the short-term effects of gain, without exploring long-term usage impacts.
    • Future directions include investigating gain perception on other rotational axes (e.g., roll and pitch) and testing other scenarios (e.g., flight simulators, 4D movies, or train carriages). Additionally, the applicability of perceptual manipulation techniques should be evaluated through various types of tasks.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/188615/2025

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3706598.3713455
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2025
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
5 authors
sell
Subtopics
Motion Sickness & Passenger Experience, Immersion & Presence Research
work
Professions
—
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers