Designing for Transactional Moments: Features of Tools for Child-centred Speech Language Teletherapy
Authors
Force Feedback & Pseudo-Haptic WeightSpecial Education TechnologySpeech-Language Pathologists & AudiologistsSpecial Education TeachersEarly Childhood Educators
Research Background and Issues
- Identified Problems or Challenges: This paper focuses on the characteristics of online and face-to-face speech-language therapy tools, particularly how they support or hinder interactive "transactional activities" between therapists and children. Current research has not thoroughly explored the role of tools in remote and face-to-face therapy.
- Significance: Early intervention is critical for children's language development. When geographical or social constraints prevent face-to-face therapy, remote therapy becomes an important alternative. Therefore, understanding how tools influence interaction and effectiveness in remote therapy is of great importance.
- Research Motivation and Related Work: The study aims to explore the material and social impacts of tools in therapist-child interactions. Existing research primarily focuses on the perspectives of parents and therapists or the standalone use of digital technologies, neglecting the role of tools in actual therapy settings.
Solution
- Proposed Approach or Solution: Through the analysis of 10 video recordings, the paper examines three therapy cases in detail to observe how tools are used in therapist-child interactions and how they influence therapy goals. The study adopts a design-oriented research approach and a socio-material analysis perspective.
- Innovations:
- Identified four necessary conditions for designing tools to support interaction: levels of interaction, spatial control, open interaction points, and content flexibility.
- Proposed a concept that integrates social interaction and tool design to optimize the application of therapy tools in remote environments.
- Implementation Steps and Key Techniques:
- Conducted case studies using video recordings in natural settings and multimodal analysis.
- Utilized video data analysis tools for coding and classifying interaction patterns.
- Proposed key design features to improve existing tools, making them better suited to support social and goal-oriented activities in language therapy.
Research Outcomes
- Specific Findings:
- Identified how the functional characteristics of physical and digital tools can support or hinder transactional activities in language therapy.
- Proposed design requirements for tools to address critical aspects of language therapy, including better support for children's autonomy, engagement, and learning outcomes.
- Comparison with Existing Solutions:
- Unlike traditional digital tools, this study emphasizes how tools serve social interaction and transactional activities in therapy environments rather than merely providing recording or gaming functions.
- Stressed that tool design should consider not only functionality but also support for social and interactive aspects.
- Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- Case analyses revealed that tools with clear interactive functions, controllable spatial mechanisms, and diverse content more effectively support therapy goals.
- Tools that fail to align with children's interests or lack flexibility can disrupt coordinated interactions and reduce therapy effectiveness.
- Limitations and Future Directions:
- Limitations:
- The small sample size (10 videos) limits the generalizability of the findings.
- Feedback from therapists and parents has not been thoroughly explored.
- Future Directions:
- Expand the sample size to include more diverse types of language disorders and therapists.
- Develop preliminary technology prototypes based on this research and test their effectiveness with actual users (children, therapists) through co-design methods.
- Further investigate how digital tools can encourage social interaction and playfulness in language therapy for children.
- Limitations:
Through this study, the design of language therapy tools can achieve a better balance between functionality and interactivity, meeting the needs of both face-to-face and remote therapy while ensuring that the therapy process remains flexible enough to cater to children's interests and social needs.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
help
Research Questions
3- How do online and in-person language therapy tools support or hinder transactional activity between therapists and children?Category: Child Digital Wellbeing and Gaming ExperienceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can language therapy tool design better support children's autonomous motivation, engagement, and learning outcomes?Category: Child Digital Wellbeing and Gaming ExperienceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Which tool features affect effectiveness of social interaction in language therapy environments?Category: Child Digital Wellbeing and Gaming ExperienceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
lightbulb
Practical Problems
1- Language therapy tools struggle to simultaneously meet functional and interactional needs.Category: Child Digital Wellbeing and Gaming ExperienceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 80%
CoPracTter: Toward Integrating Personalized Practice Scenarios, Timely Feedback and Social Support into An Online Support Tool for Coping with Stuttering in China
CHI '23· Force Feedback & Pseudo-Haptic Weight +1
- 67%
BebeCode: Collaborative Child Development Tracking System
CHI '18· Early Childhood Education Technology +1
- 67%
Impact of Interaction Context on the Student Affect-Learning Relationship in Child-Robot Interaction
HRI '20· Special Education Technology +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)
Quick Actions
AdRecommended
Learn AI Coding at CodeNow
open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3706598.3713394
At a Glance
fact_checkPaper Snapshot
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2025
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
5 authors
sell
Subtopics
Force Feedback & Pseudo-Haptic Weight, Special Education Technology
work
Professions
Speech-Language Pathologists & Audiologists, Special Education Teachers, Early Childhood Educators
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
3 related papers