Designing Scaffolding Strategies for Conversational Agents in Dialog Task of Neurocognitive Disorders Screening

Conversational ChatbotsCognitive Impairment & Neurodiversity (Autism, ADHD, Dyslexia)Physicians, Nurses & CliniciansPsychiatrists & PsychotherapistsSpeech-Language Pathologists & Audiologists

Title of the Paper

Scaffolding Strategies for Conversational Agents in Dialogue Tasks for Neurocognitive Disorder Screening

Bibliographic Information

  • Subject Areas: Human-Computer Interaction, Health and Aging, Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Keywords: Health, Aging, Scaffolding, Conversational Agents, Neurocognitive Disorder Screening

Research Background and Problem

  • Identified Problems or Challenges:
    • Neurocognitive disorders (NCDs), such as Alzheimer's disease, are prevalent among older adults, imposing a significant burden on patients, families, and healthcare systems.
    • Existing human-administered screening methods face scalability challenges, such as limited clinical resources and patients' mobility constraints.
    • Current conversational agent (CA) screening systems often employ simple dialogue strategies, but communication with cognitively impaired users requires more sophisticated techniques, such as simplified language, repetition, and scaffolding.
  • Why This Problem is Important:
    • Early diagnosis and intervention can effectively manage NCD-related symptoms, alleviating societal and healthcare pressures.
    • Developing scalable screening methods can support routine cognitive monitoring and long-term tracking of cognitive functions.
  • Research Motivation and Related Work:
    • Scaffolding theory has been shown to be crucial in facilitating activity comprehension and engagement for NCD patients, but its design and application in dialogue tasks remain underexplored.
    • Enhancing CA capabilities by mimicking clinical professionals' scaffolding practices can help build a dialogue system tailored to NCD patients.

Solution

  • Proposed Method or Solution:
    • Based on scaffolding theory and clinical professionals' practices, analyze scaffolding strategies from video recordings of human-administered tests and propose a scaffolding framework for CAs.
    • Design a CA using a three-level scaffolding framework, including activity-level, action-level, and repair-level scaffolding.
    • Develop a semi-automated CA system that leverages ChatGPT (gpt-3.5-turbo) to support the retrieval and reasoning of core scaffolding strategies.
  • Innovative Contributions:
    • The first study to explore how CAs can support NCD screening tasks through scaffolding strategies.
    • Combines scaffolding theory with users' cognitive development states (Zone of Proximal Development theory) to dynamically adjust scaffolding strategies based on users' task comprehension levels.
    • Proposes a framework and specific design processes to improve CA performance in cognitive impairment screening tasks.
  • Implementation Steps and Key Technologies:
    • Conduct content analysis of dialogues between clinical professionals and participants to extract human scaffolding strategies.
    • Use an iterative design process to develop a CA prototype and evaluate the applicability of its scaffolding framework.
    • Integrate ChatGPT into the system to support dynamic question generation and optimization of scaffolding strategies.

Research Outcomes

  • Specific Results:
    • The proposed CA was able to provide dynamic scaffolding, which was rated as appropriate in 89.45% of cases by professional clinicians.
    • Experiments showed that the use of scaffolding by the CA decreased progressively as tasks advanced, indicating that the scaffolding strategies facilitated users' task comprehension.
    • 68.25% of the scaffolding strategies recommended by ChatGPT were rated as appropriate by clinical experts.
  • Advantages Over Existing Solutions:
    • Compared to existing NCD screening methods (e.g., tablet- or touchscreen-based), the proposed method better encompasses language and cognitive function testing.
    • The dynamic adjustment of the scaffolding framework allows the CA to tailor scaffolding strategies based on users' cognitive states, improving task completion rates.
  • Experimental or Evaluation Results:
    • User studies involved 15 participants (including healthy individuals, and those with mild and major cognitive impairments), with each participant completing at least one valid task (average of 2.87 tasks completed).
    • Most participants found the CA's scaffolding helpful for task comprehension and easy to use.
  • Limitations and Future Directions:
    • The sample size was small, and future studies should expand the sample size and conduct statistical validation.
    • The current CA is semi-automated and requires further development into a fully automated version to validate the reliability of screening results.
    • The study focused on a specific task (GSDT); future research should evaluate its generalizability to other cognitive screening tasks.
    • Although the system's manual operation delays were deemed acceptable, further optimization is needed to support smooth user navigation during tasks.

Conclusion and Design Implications

  • Integrate a three-level scaffolding framework (activity-level, action-level, repair-level) into CA design to meet users' needs at different stages.
  • Dynamically adjust the frequency and type of scaffolding based on users' Zone of Proximal Development states.
  • For future automated CA development, leverage visual and language models to better handle language and visual information in complex scenarios.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/147967/2024

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642960
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2024
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
7 authors
sell
Subtopics
Conversational Chatbots, Cognitive Impairment & Neurodiversity (Autism, ADHD, Dyslexia)
work
Professions
Physicians, Nurses & Clinicians, Psychiatrists & Psychotherapists, Speech-Language Pathologists & Audiologists
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
1 related papers