The Role of Inclusion, Control, and Ownership in Workplace AI-Mediated Communication
Authors
Given large language models' (LLMs) increasing integration into workplace software, it is important to examine how biases in the models may impact workers. For example, stylistic biases in the language suggested by LLMs may cause feelings of alienation and result in increased labor for individuals or groups whose style does not match. We examine how such writer-style bias impacts inclusion, control, and ownership over the work when co-writing with LLMs. In an online experiment, participants wrote hypothetical job promotion requests using either hesitant or self-assured autocomplete suggestions from an LLM and reported their subsequent perceptions. We found that the style of the AI model did not impact perceived inclusion. However, individuals with higher perceived inclusion did perceive greater agency and ownership, an effect more strongly impacting participants of minoritized genders. Feelings of inclusion mitigated a loss of control and agency when accepting more AI suggestions.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
AI-Driven Mediation Strategies for Audience Depolarisation in Online Debates
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 67%
The Effects of Perceived AI Use On Content Perceptions
CHI '24· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 67%
Lay Perceptions of Algorithmic Discrimination in the Context of Systemic Injustice
CHI '25· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
Generative AI and Perceptual Harms: Who’s Suspected of using LLMs?
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 60%
Black LLMirror: User (Self) Perceptions in Black American English Interactions with LLMs
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)