“Some Hope, Many Despair”: Experiences of the Normalization within Online Dating among Queer Women in a Closeted Society

Gender & Race Issues in HCILGBTQ+ Community Technology Design

Title of the Paper

“Some Hope, Many Despair”: Experiences of the Normalization within Online Dating among Queer Women in a Closeted Society

Paper Information

  • Field: Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and LGBTQ+ Online Dating Experiences
  • Keywords: Queer women, Online dating, Technology-mediated queer interaction, Queerness, Normalization

Research Background and Issues

  • Identified Problems or Challenges:

    • LGBTQ+ communities face challenges in expressing queer identities, building relationships, and ensuring safety through online dating technologies.
    • Existing research predominantly focuses on the online dating experiences of gay men, neglecting the unique experiences of LGBTQ+ women, especially in non-Western contexts.
    • The ways in which queer women in South Korea navigate online dating technologies to connect with others while confronting a highly oppressive heteronormative societal culture remain underexplored.
  • Significance:

    • LGBTQ+ women face dual marginalization in heteronormative societies, encountering greater obstacles than other sexual minority groups in environments with low levels of legal protection and social acceptance.
    • Online dating technologies have the potential to provide privacy and safety, but whether these technologies genuinely support identity exploration and diverse interactions for queer women warrants further investigation.
  • Research Motivation and Related Work:

    • The authors aim to examine how online dating technologies reshape the presentation of “queerness,” relationship-building, and community identity among South Korean LGBTQ+ women, particularly within a highly conservative sociocultural context.
    • This study addresses the gap in understanding LGBTQ+ women’s online dating experiences and provides critical insights into how technology design can better support diverse sexual minority groups.

Solutions

  • Proposed Approach or Research Design:

    • A qualitative research approach was employed, collecting narratives and experiences from 17 South Korean LGBTQ+ women through semi-structured interviews.
    • The study focuses on the following research questions:
      1. What are the initial expectations of South Korean LGBTQ+ women regarding online dating platforms?
      2. What structural challenges are introduced by online dating technologies, and how do these challenges impact user experiences?
      3. How do sexual minority women strategically use online dating technologies to address these challenges and enhance their autonomy?
  • Innovative Contributions:

    • Through narrative accounts and theoretical analysis, the study identifies how online dating platforms systematically normalize “queerness” and reveals how technology design intertwines with cultural frameworks to produce marginalizing effects.
    • Proposes design improvements, such as features tailored to the interaction characteristics of the community, to counteract existing institutional shortcomings.
  • Implementation Steps and Key Techniques:

    • Participants were recruited through anonymous online channels to ensure privacy.
    • Key narratives were extracted through semi-structured interviews, including initial motivations, interaction experiences, challenges, and strategies.
    • Data were analyzed using a constructivist grounded theory approach to identify high-frequency themes and theoretical categories.

Research Findings

  • Specific Findings:

    • The study identifies how online dating technologies normalize “queerness” across three dimensions (sexual orientation presentation, relationship types, and community boundaries):
      1. Systematic imposition of gender expression norms through appearance-based labels and preset categories (e.g., long hair being more desirable).
      2. Emphasis on romantic relationships as the primary interaction goal, limiting exploratory, non-romantic interactions.
      3. Reinforcement of community entry barriers (favoring cisgender lesbians) while excluding marginalized groups such as transgender individuals and bisexuals.
  • Strengths and Contributions:

    • Deepens understanding of the practices and perceptions of sexual minority women when interacting through online dating applications.
    • Highlights how technology influences queer interactions, revealing its role in subtly normalizing queer interactions and challenging the non-normative and inclusive characteristics that queer interactions should embody.
    • Explores how sociocultural norms are reinforced through technology design, perpetuating exclusionary mechanisms within queer communities.
  • Experimental and Evaluation Results:

    • Participants commonly reported that online dating platforms failed to support open-ended interactions, instead steering them toward conforming to mainstream gender performance and heteronormative intimacy frameworks.
    • Participants strategically leveraged the real-time interaction features of online dating technologies to attempt more natural group interactions (e.g., instant meetups) and break through normalization constraints.
    • Proposed design improvements include introducing group-matching features to facilitate broader community interactions.
  • Limitations and Future Directions:

    • Limitations:
      1. Participants were limited to South Korean women aged 18–28, making it difficult to fully represent the online dating experiences of all LGBTQ+ groups.
      2. The sample did not include transgender individuals, leaving out a more comprehensive range of sexual minority groups.
      3. The research team lacked queer members, potentially introducing a heteronormative bias in perspectives.
    • Future Directions:
      • Recruit a more diverse range of participants to improve representativeness.
      • Explore how online dating technologies can support broader gender and sexual orientations while reducing normalization tendencies.
      • Combine technology design with sociocultural contexts to provide truly inclusive interaction mechanisms for sexual minority groups.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/147298/2024

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642893
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2024
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
3 authors
sell
Subtopics
Gender & Race Issues in HCI, LGBTQ+ Community Technology Design
work
Professions
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
5 related papers