Observable Creative Sense-Making (OCSM): A Method For Quantifying Improvisational Co-Creative Interaction
Authors
This paper introduces a new method for quantifying open-ended collaborative embodied improvisation: Observable Creative Sense-Making (OCSM). This technique builds on previous work on Creative Sense-Making (CSM), examines its shortcomings, and addresses it by reformalizing and grounding CSM in current literature from embodied social cognition and an intersubjective perspective of creativity. We apply this method to empirical studies of human collaboration in dance improvisation with 16 advanced college dancers and establish the method's validity. The OCSM method described in this paper includes a qualitative coding technique, a web-based tool for coding the interaction, and the cognitive theory behind its application.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 75%
Understanding Kinaesthetic Creativity in Dance
CHI '19· Full-Body Interaction & Embodied Input +1
- 75%
Boards Hit Back: Reflecting on Martial Arts Practices Through Soma Design
CHI '23· Full-Body Interaction & Embodied Input +1
- 75%
Tuning In to Intangibility: Reflections from My First 3 Years of Theremin Learning
DIS '24· Full-Body Interaction & Embodied Input +1
- 75%
Expanding the Design Space of Computer Vision-based Interactive Systems for Group Dance Practice
DIS '24· Full-Body Interaction & Embodied Input +1
- 60%
danceON: Culturally Responsive Creative Computing
CHI '21· Full-Body Interaction & Embodied Input +1
- 60%
Dance Transitions: What Forms of Technology Best Support Professional Dancers as They Learn New Movement Styles?
CHI '22· Full-Body Interaction & Embodied Input +2
- 60%
Design Resources in Movement-based Design Methods: a Practice-based Characterization
DIS '23· Full-Body Interaction & Embodied Input +1
- 60%
A Golfer’s Swing Thoughts: Exploring Design Support for Reflection in Embodied Experience
DIS '25· Full-Body Interaction & Embodied Input +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)