Investigating Various Dynamics in the Box Task Combined With a Detection Response Task: Are There Performance Differences Between Uniform and Non-uniform Box Dynamics?
Authors
The Box Task combined with a Detection Response Task (BT + DRT) is a relatively less investigated but promising method for evaluating visual-manual and cognitive task demand due to the interaction with in-vehicle information systems while driving. The BT includes the tracking of a dynamic box whose size and position follow a sinusoidal pattern with uniform amplitudes and frequencies. However, it is unclear whether participants are able to predict and adapt to these uniform dynamics, which might lead to a reduced sensitivity of the BT + DRT. Within the present study, it was aimed to examine differences in BT + DRT performance depending on uniform and non-uniform BT dynamics. A laboratory study was conducted with N = 41 participants. The experimental conditions differed in the type and difficulty level of the secondary tasks as well as in the BT dynamics (uniform, varying amplitude, varying frequency). While the uniform BT dynamics could be more predictable, the non-uniform BT dynamics were designed slightly easier in their difficulty using a lower frequency or amplitude. The results revealed no performance benefits when performing uniform BT dynamics compared to non-uniform BT dynamics. The frequency BT condition was related to a significantly lower variability of box position and higher gaze duration on the secondary task compared to the uniform BT dynamics. These findings suggest that participants are not or only negligible able to adapt to the uniform BT dynamics. Therefore, it is recommended to use the uniform BT dynamics as suggested and implemented in previous studies.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 67%
AEGIS: Human Attention-based Explainable Guidance for Intelligent Vehicle Systems
CHI '25· Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) +2
- 60%
Cognitive Load Estimation in the Wild
CHI '18· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 60%
An Eye Gaze Heatmap Analysis of Uncertainty Head-Up Display Designs for Conditional Automated Driving
CHI '24· Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) +1
- 60%
A Longitudinal Study on the Effects of Circadian Fatigue on Sound Source Identification and Localization using a Heads-Up Display
CHI '25· Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) +1
- 60%
Trust and Visual Focus in Automated Vehicles: A Comparative Study of Beginner and Experienced Drivers
CHI '25· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
Comfortably Going Blank: Optimizing the Position of Optical Combiners for Monocular Head-Worn Displays During Inactivity
UbiComp '24· Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) +1
- 60%
Touchscreens in Motion: Quantifying the Impact of Cognitive Load on Distracted Drivers
UIST '25· Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) +1
- 60%
Fitts Goes Autobahn: Assessing the Visual Demand of Finger-Touch Pointing Tasks in an On-Road Study
AutoUI '19· Automated Driving Interface & Takeover Design +1
- 60%
Modelling Drivers' Adaptation to Assistance Systems
AutoUI '21· Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)