interiqr: Unobtrusive Edible Tags using Food 3D Printing
Authors
Document Title
interiqr: Unobtrusive Edible Tags using Food 3D Printing
Document Information
- Subject Area: Edible tags, human-food interaction, innovative applications of digital 3D food printing
- Keywords: digital manufacturing, food 3D printing, human-food interaction, invisible tags, edible codes
Research Background and Problem
-
Identified Problems or Challenges:
- Food tags have broad applications in storing information, identifying food origins, and enhancing dining experiences, but existing methods often compromise food aesthetics or are difficult to consume.
- Most existing embedded tags rely on physical or chemical alterations of the food surface, which may limit ingredient choices and negatively impact food appearance and appeal.
- Hidden information needs to be machine-readable while remaining virtually invisible, a balance that current technologies struggle to achieve.
-
Significance of the Research:
- Developing invisible and edible tags has significant implications for the food industry, personalized dining, and innovative applications in human-food interaction (HFI).
- It promotes advancements in food traceability, personalized diets, and intelligent food management.
-
Motivation and Related Work:
- To address the conflict between tag functionality and food aesthetics/edibility, the researchers designed an innovative framework combining food materials, 3D printing technology, and image processing, building on extensive prior work in digital 3D printing and human-computer interaction.
Solution
-
Proposed Method or Solution:
- A method (interiqr) is proposed to embed information inside food using 3D printing without altering the external geometry, making the information tag invisible to the human eye but machine-readable.
- QR codes (or AR markers) are constructed using internal infill structures or multiple food materials during the 3D printing process.
-
Innovative Aspects:
- Tags are concealed within the food and made entirely from edible materials.
- An end-to-end 3D printing workflow is provided, integrating data embedding and tag decoding.
- A backend image processing technique is developed to capture hidden information using backlighting and a camera.
-
Implementation Steps and Key Technologies:
- Tag Generation:
- Based on user-provided text, images, or hyperlinks, the infill patterns and printing paths of the 3D-printed food are calculated.
- For infill rates below 70%, binary encoding is generated using air gaps and infill structures; for rates above 70%, multiple food materials (e.g., different-colored food materials) are used for marking.
- Food 3D Printing:
- A food-specific 3D printer (e.g., syringe-based printer) is used to embed tags into the food.
- Required support structures and parameters are automatically calculated by dedicated software.
- Tag Decoding:
- Backlighting (visible or infrared light) is used to illuminate the food, and a camera captures the images.
- Image processing techniques extract QR codes or marker information, which are decoded using standard image libraries (e.g., QR code libraries).
- Tag Generation:
Research Outcomes
-
Specific Outcomes:
- Successfully developed a complete workflow for creating invisible edible tags using 3D printing.
- Validated the tag's invisibility, readability, and edibility on various food materials (e.g., cookie dough).
- Provided practical evaluations of tag embedding, including transmission spectrum experiments, tag size testing, and user dining experience surveys.
-
Advantages Over Existing Solutions:
- Tag Invisibility: By using infill structures or material combinations, the food's geometry or appearance remains unchanged.
- Edibility: Tags are entirely made from food materials, requiring no non-food components.
- Functionality: Hidden data or markers enhance food interactivity and traceability.
-
Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- Tag Readability: Tags created with infill structures or multi-materials maintained good machine recognition under various lighting conditions; combining air gaps with multi-materials extended the recognition distance to 35 cm.
- Tag Invisibility: Improved support structures resolved surface bulges and depressions during the baking process, resulting in a smoother contour.
- User Experience: In user testing, food with embedded tags showed no significant differences in texture or perceived sweetness compared to food without tags.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- For more complex ingredients (e.g., moist or unstable materials), the robustness of internal structures needs further optimization.
- Tag information capacity is limited; the current system can embed small QR codes but not large, complex datasets.
- The application of infrared spectrum tags requires exploration of more materials and absorption properties.
- Flexibility: Adapting the method to other food manufacturing techniques (e.g., molds) and more diverse food forms (e.g., vegetables or meat).
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How can invisible, edible, machine-readable tags be embedded in food without changing appearance or taste?Category: Edible Information Encoding and Food Interaction DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can information hidden inside food be constructed and decoded using 3D food printing technology?Category: Edible Information Encoding and Food Interaction DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do different infill structures or multi-material combinations affect tag invisibility and readability?Category: Edible Information Encoding and Food Interaction DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- The food industry struggles to balance aesthetics and practicality in information labeling.Category: Edible Information Encoding and Food Interaction DesignSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 60%
Forte: User-Driven Generative Design
CHI '18· Desktop 3D Printing & Personal Fabrication +1
- 60%
Grafter: Remixing 3D-Printed Machines
CHI '18· Desktop 3D Printing & Personal Fabrication +1
- 60%
Geodesy: Self-rising 2.5D Tiles by Printing along 2D Geodesic Closed Path
CHI '19· Shape-Changing Interfaces & Soft Robotic Materials +1
- 60%
Barriers to End-User Designers of Augmented Fabrication
CHI '19· Desktop 3D Printing & Personal Fabrication +1
- 60%
FiberWire: Embedding Electronic Function into 3D Printed Mechanically Strong, Lightweight Carbon Fiber Composite Objects
CHI '19· Desktop 3D Printing & Personal Fabrication +1
- 60%
Scrappy: Using Scrap Material as Infill To Make Fabrication More Sustainable
CHI '21· Desktop 3D Printing & Personal Fabrication +1
- 60%
Fabricaide: Fabrication-Aware Design for 2D Cutting Machines
CHI '21· Desktop 3D Printing & Personal Fabrication +1
- 60%
FabricatINK: Personal Fabrication of Bespoke Displays Using Electronic Ink from Upcycled E Readers
CHI '22· Desktop 3D Printing & Personal Fabrication +1
- 60%
All-in-One Print: Designing and 3D Printing Dynamic Objects Using Kinematic Mechanism Without Assembly
CHI '23· Desktop 3D Printing & Personal Fabrication +1
- 60%
TensionFab: Fabrication of Room-scale Surface Structures From the Tension-Active Form of Planar Modules
CHI '24· Desktop 3D Printing & Personal Fabrication +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)