Magneto-Haptics: Embedding Magnetic Force Feedback for Physical Interactions
We present magneto-haptics, a design approach of haptic sensations powered by the forces present among permanent magnets during active touch. Magnetic force has not been efficiently explored in haptic design because it is not intuitive and there is a lack of methods to associate or visualize magnetic force with haptic sensations, especially for complex magnetic patterns. To represent the haptic sensations of magnetic force intuitively, magneto-haptics formularizes haptic potential from the distribution of magnetic force along the path of motion. It provides a rapid way to compute the relationship between the magnetic phenomena and the haptic mechanism. Thus, we can convert a magnetic force distribution into a haptic sensation model, making the design of magnet-embedded haptic sensations more efficient. We demonstrate three applications of magneto-haptics through interactive interfaces and devices. We further verify our theory by evaluating some magneto-haptic designs through experiments.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Stick&Slip: Altering Fingerpad Friction via Liquid Coatings
CHI '24· Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation +1
- 100%
Smiles Summon the Warmth of Spring: A Design Framework for Thermal-Affective Interaction based in Chinese Cí Poetry
DIS '24· Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation +1
- 67%
PneuSleeve: In-fabric Multimodal Actuation and Sensing in a Soft, Compact, and Expressive Haptic Sleeve
CHI '20· Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation +2
- 67%
Shaping Compliance: Inducing Haptic Illusion of Compliance in Different Shapes with Electrotactile Grains
CHI '24· Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation +2
- 67%
Tendon Vibration for Creating Movement Illusions in Virtual Reality
CHI '25· Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation +2
- 67%
PrintShear: Shear Input Based on Fingerprint Deformation
UbiComp '23· Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)