Why am I seeing this: Democratizing End User Auditing for Online Content Recommendations
Authors
Personalized recommendation systems tailor content based on user attributes, which are either provided or inferred from private data. Research suggests that users often hypothesize about reasons behind contents they encounter (e.g., ``I see this jewelry ad because I am a woman''), but they lack the means to confirm these hypotheses due to the opaqueness of these systems. This hinders informed decision-making about privacy and system use and contributes to the lack of algorithmic accountability. To address these challenges, we introduce a new interactive sandbox approach. This approach creates sets of synthetic user personas and corresponding personal data that embody realistic variations in personal attributes, allowing users to test their hypotheses by observing how a website's algorithms respond to these personas. We tested the sandbox in the context of targeted advertisement. Our user study demonstrates its usability, usefulness, and effectiveness in empowering end-user auditing in a case study of targeting ads.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 86%
Access Denied: Meaningful Data Access for Quantitative Algorithm Audits
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 75%
PASTA: A Scalable Framework for Multi-Policy AI Compliance Evaluation
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +3
- 71%
Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systems
CHI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 71%
HILL: A Hallucination Identifier for Large Language Models
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 63%
Exploring What People Need to Know to be AI Literate: Tailoring for a Diversity of AI Roles and Responsibilities
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 63%
Towards AI Accountability Infrastructure: Gaps and Opportunities in AI Audit Tooling
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 63%
Decomposing Autonomy: Explaining AI Technology Acceptance Through a Liberty-Based Framework
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 63%
Red Teaming LLMs as Socio-Technical Practice: From Exploration and Data Creation to Evaluation
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 63%
Certified AI System = Trustworthy? Exploring Expert and Lay User Perceptions and Needs Regarding AI Certification
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 63%
When Life Gives You AI, Will You Turn It Into A Market for Lemons? Understanding How Information Asymmetries About AI System Capabilities Affect Market Outcomes and Adoption
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)