Qlarify: Recursively Expandable Abstracts for Dynamic Information Retrieval over Scientific Papers
Authors
Navigating the vast scientific literature often starts with browsing a paper’s abstract. However, when a reader seeks additional information, not present in the abstract, they face a costly cognitive chasm during their dive into the full text. To bridge this gap, we introduce recursively expandable abstracts, a novel interaction paradigm that dynamically expands abstracts by progressively incorporating additional information from the papers’ full text. This lightweight interaction allows scholars to specify their information needs by quickly brushing over the abstract or selecting AI-suggested expandable entities. Relevant information is synthesized using a retrieval-augmented generation approach, presented as a fluid, threaded expansion of the abstract, and made efficiently verifiable via attribution to relevant source-passages in the paper. Through a series of user studies, we demonstrate the utility of recursively expandable abstracts and identify future opportunities to support low-effort and just-in-time exploration of long-form information contexts through LLM-powered interactions.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 67%
Finding Needles in Document Haystacks: Augmenting Serendipitous Claim Retrieval Workflows
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 60%
Mapping the Landscape of COVID-19 Crisis Visualizations
CHI '21· Interactive Data Visualization +1
- 60%
Cody: An AI-Based System to Semi-Automate Coding for Qualitative Research
CHI '21· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
Troubling Collaboration: Matters of Care for Visualization Design Study
CHI '23· Interactive Data Visualization +1
- 60%
CiteSee: Augmenting Citations in Scientific Papers with Persistent and Personalized Historical Context
CHI '23· Interactive Data Visualization +1
- 60%
PaperWeaver: Enriching Topical Paper Alerts by Contextualizing Recommended Papers with User-collected Papers
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Literature Understanding and Review: An Empirical Study among Early-stage Scholars
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
Understanding the Role of Large Language Models in Personalizing and Scaffolding Strategies to Combat Academic Procrastination
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
PromptHive: Bringing Subject Matter Experts Back to the Forefront with Collaborative Prompt Engineering for Educational Content Creation
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
Social-RAG: Retrieving from Group Interactions to Socially Ground AI Generation
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)