Can You Ear Me? — A Comparison of Different Private and Public Notification Channels for the Earlobe
Authors
"The earlobe is a well-known location for wearing jewelry, but might also be promising for electronic output, such as presenting notifications. This work elaborates the pros and cons of different notification channels for the earlobe. Notifications on the earlobe can be private (only noticeable by the wearer) as well as public (noticeable in the immediate vicinity in a given social situation). A user study with 18 participants showed that the reaction times for the private channels (Poke, Vibration, Private Sound, Electrotactile) were on average less than 1 s with an error rate (missed notifications) of less than 1 %. Thermal Warm and Cold took significantly longer and Cold was least reliable (26 % error rate). The participants preferred Electrotactile and Vibration. Among the public channels the recognition time did not differ significantly between Sound (738 ms) and LED (828 ms), but Display took much longer (3175 ms). At 22 % the error rate of Display was highest. The participants generally felt comfortable wearing notification devices on their earlobe. The results show that the earlobe indeed is a suitable location for wearable technology, if properly miniaturized, which is possible for Electrotactile and LED. We present application scenarios and discuss design considerations. A small field study in a fitness center demonstrates the suitability of the earlobe notification concept in a sports context." https://doi.org/10.1145/3610925
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Contact Tracing for HealthcareWorkers in an Intensive Care Unit
UbiComp '23· In-Vehicle Haptic, Audio & Multimodal Feedback +2
- 67%
VibEye: Vibration-Mediated Object Recognition for Tangible Interactive Applications
CHI '19· Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation +1
- 67%
What HCI Can Learn from ASMR: Becoming Enchanted with the Mundane
CHI '20· In-Vehicle Haptic, Audio & Multimodal Feedback +1
- 67%
Gaiters: Exploring Skin Stretch Feedback on Legs for Enhancing Virtual Reality Experiences
CHI '20· Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation +1
- 67%
ThermoCaress: A Wearable Haptic Device with Illusory Moving Thermal Stimulation
CHI '21· Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation +1
- 67%
Vibration-Augmented Buttons: Information Transmission Capacity and Application to Interaction Design
CHI '22· In-Vehicle Haptic, Audio & Multimodal Feedback +1
- 67%
HUGO, a High-Resolution Tactile Emulator for Complex Surfaces
CHI '23· In-Vehicle Haptic, Audio & Multimodal Feedback +1
- 67%
vARitouch: Back of the Finger Device for Adding Variable Compliance to Rigid Objects
CHI '24· Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation +1
- 67%
Somaesthetic Meditation Wearable: Exploring the Effect of Targeted Warmth Technology on Meditators' Experiences
CHI '24· Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation +1
- 67%
Background Perception and Comprehension of Symbols Conveyed through Vibrotactile Wearable Displays
IUI '19· Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)