Uncovering Bias in Personal Informatics
Authors
"Personal informatics (PI) systems, powered by smartphones and wearables, enable people to lead healthier lifestyles by providing meaningful and actionable insights that break down barriers between users and their health information. Today, such systems are used by billions of users for monitoring not only physical activity and sleep but also vital signs and women's and heart health, among others. Despite their widespread usage, the processing of sensitive PI data may suffer from biases, which may entail practical and ethical implications. In this work, we present the first comprehensive empirical and analytical study of bias in PI systems, including biases in raw data and in the entire machine learning life cycle. We use the most detailed framework to date for exploring the different sources of bias and find that biases exist both in the data generation and the model learning and implementation streams. According to our results, the most affected minority groups are users with health issues, such as diabetes, joint issues, and hypertension, and female users, whose data biases are propagated or even amplified by learning models, while intersectional biases can also be observed." https://doi.org/10.1145/3610914
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 67%
Explanatory Debiasing: Involving Domain Experts in the Data Generation Process to Mitigate Representation Bias in AI Systems
CHI '25· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
The Landscape and Gaps in Open Source Fairness Toolkits
CHI '21· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
Towards Fairness in Practice: A Practitioner-Oriented Rubric for Evaluating Fair ML Toolkits
CHI '21· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning Models
CHI '22· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
Capable but Amoral? Comparing AI and Human Expert Collaboration in Ethical Decision Making
CHI '22· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of "Artificial Intelligence as a Service"
CHI '23· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
“It is currently hodgepodge”: Examining AI/ML Practitioners’ Challenges during Co-production of Responsible AI Values
CHI '23· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
The ``Colonial Impulse" of Natural Language Processing: An Audit of Bengali Sentiment Analysis Tools and Their Identity-based Biases
CHI '24· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
STILE: Exploring and Debugging Social Biases in Pre-trained Text Representations
CHI '24· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
A Canary in the AI Coal Mine: American Jews May Be Disproportionately Harmed by Intellectual Property Dispossession in Large Language Model Training
CHI '24· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)