Generalization and Personalization of Mobile Sensing-Based Mood Inference Models: An Analysis of College Students in Eight Countries
Authors
Amalia De Gamalia De Götzen
Aalborg UniversityAlethia Hume
Luca Cernuzzi
Ivano Bison
Marcelo Rodas Britez
Matteo Busso
Ronald Chenu-Abente
Can Günel
And Fausto Giunchiglia
Laura Schelenz
Mood inference with mobile sensing data has been studied in ubicomp literature over the last decade. This inference enables context-aware and personalized user experiences in general mobile apps and valuable feedback and interventions in mobile health apps. However, even though model generalization issues have been highlighted in many studies, the focus has always been on improving the accuracies of models using different sensing modalities and machine learning techniques, with datasets collected in homogeneous populations. In contrast, less attention has been given to studying the performance of mood inference models to assess whether models generalize to new countries. In this study, we collected a mobile sensing dataset with 329K self-reports from 678 participants in eight countries (China, Denmark, India, Italy, Mexico, Mongolia, Paraguay, UK) to assess the effect of geographical diversity on mood inference models. We define and evaluate country-specific (trained and tested within a country), continent-specific (trained and tested within a continent), country-agnostic (tested on a country not seen on training data), and multi-country (trained and tested with multiple countries) approaches trained on sensor data for two mood inference tasks with population-level (non-personalized) and hybrid (partially personalized) models. We show that partially personalized country-specific models perform the best yielding area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) scores of the range 0.78--0.98 for two-class (negative vs. positive valence) and 0.76--0.94 for three-class (negative vs. neutral vs. positive valence) inference. Further, with the country-agnostic approach, we show that models do not perform well compared to country-specific settings, even when models are partially personalized. We also show that continent-specific models outperform multi-country models in the case of Europe. Overall, we uncover generalization issues of mood inference models to new countries and how the geographical similarity of countries might impact mood inference. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569483
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- Can mobile sensing-based emotion inference models generalize across cultural and geographic differences?Category: Affect, Emotion, and Mental Health State InferenceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Can partial personalization of emotion inference models improve model accuracy?Category: Affect, Emotion, and Mental Health State InferenceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Which sensing features show strong correlation in cross-regional emotion inference?Category: Affect, Emotion, and Mental Health State InferenceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Existing emotion inference models perform poorly in cross-cultural contexts, limiting broad application.Category: Affect, Emotion, and Mental Health State InferenceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 67%
Peerspective: A Study on Reciprocal Tracking for Self-awareness and Relational Insight
CHI '25· Collaborative Learning & Peer Teaching +2
- 67%
Proposing a Context-informed Layer-based Framework: Incorporating Context into Designing mHealth Technology for Fatigue Management
DIS '24· Mental Health Apps & Online Support Communities +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)