Towards Rapid Interactive Machine Learning: Evaluating Tradeoffs of Classification without Representation
Authors
Our contribution is the design and evaluation of an interactive machine learning interface that rapidly provides the user with model feedback after every interaction. To address visual scalability, this interface communicates with the user via a ``tip of the iceberg'' approach, where the user interacts with a small set of recommended instances for each class. To address computational scalability, we developed an $O(n)$ classification algorithm that incorporates user feedback incrementally, and without consulting the data's underlying representation matrix. Our computational evaluation showed that this algorithm has similar accuracy to several off-the-shelf classification algorithms with small amounts of labeled data. Empirical evaluation revealed that users performed better using our design compared to an equivalent active learning setup.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
DynEx: Dynamic Code Synthesis with Structured Design Exploration for Accelerated Exploratory Programming
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 80%
EvalLM: Interactive Evaluation of Large Language Model Prompts on User-Defined Criteria
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 80%
RAG Without the Lag: Enabling "What-If" Analysis for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Pipelines
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 80%
PDFChatAnnotator: A Human-LLM Collaborative Multi-Modal Data Annotation Tool for PDF-Format Catalogs
IUI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 75%
MAPLE: Mobile App Prediction Leveraging Large Language Model Embeddings
UbiComp '24· Human-LLM Collaboration
- 75%
LlamaTouch: A Faithful and Scalable Testbed for Mobile UI Task Automation
UIST '24· Human-LLM Collaboration
- 67%
From Throw-Away to Takeaway: How GenAI and Vibe Coding Accelerate Prototyping Across Technical Skill Levels
CHI '26· Generative AI (Text, Image, Music, Video) +2
- 60%
CFar: A Tool to Increase Communication, Productivity, and Review Quality in Collaborative Code Review
CHI '18· Open-Source Collaboration & Code Review +1
- 60%
Characterizing Scalability Issues in Spreadsheet Software using Online Forums
CHI '18· User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation) +1
- 60%
ResearchIME: A Mobile Keyboard Application for Studying Free Typing Behaviour in the Wild
CHI '18· User Research Methods (Interviews, Surveys, Observation) +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)