Eye Gaze-driven Prediction of Cognitive Differences during Graphical Password Composition
Authors
Evidence suggests that individual cognitive differences affect users’ memorability, visual behavior and graphical passwords’ security. Such knowledge denotes the added value of personalizing graphical password schemes towards the unique cognitive characteristics of the users. However, real-time and accurate cognition-based predictive user models are necessary to reach such a break-through. In this paper, we present results of such an attempt, where an in-lab eye-tracking study was conducted with 36 participants who completed a recall-based graphical password composition task. We adopted a credible cognitive style theory, and investigated a variety of eye-tracking metrics to predict participants’ cognitive styles. Results’ analysis reveals that inferring individual cognitive differences in real-time during graphical password composition is feasible within a few seconds and that specific eye-tracking metrics correlate stronger with certain cognitive style groups. Findings further support the vision of incorporating real-time adaptive mechanisms in graphical password schemes for the benefit of service providers and end-users.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 67%
"Your Eyes Say You Have Used This Password Before": Identifying Password Reuse from Gaze Behavior and Keystroke Dynamics
CHI '22· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 67%
Characteristics of Deep and Skim Reading on Smartphones vs. Desktop: A Comparative Study
CHI '23· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 67%
Uncovering and Addressing Blink-Related Challenges in Using Eye Tracking for Interactive Systems
CHI '24· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 67%
MOSion: Gaze Guidance with Motion-triggered Visual Cues by Mosaic Patterns
CHI '24· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 67%
Perceived Asynchrony of Rhythmic Stimuli Affects Pupil Diameter and Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements
CHI '25· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)