When People and Algorithms Meet: User-reported Problems in Intelligent Everyday Applications
Authors
The complex nature of intelligent systems motivates work on supporting users during interaction, for example through explanations. However, there is yet little empirical evidence on specific problems users face in such systems in everyday use. This paper investigates such problems as reported by users: We analysed 35,448 reviews of three apps on the Google Play Store (Facebook, Netflix and Google Maps) with sentiment analysis and topic modelling to reveal problems during interaction that can be attributed to the apps' algorithmic decision-making. We enriched this data with users' coping and support strategies through a follow-up online survey (N=286). In particular, we found problems and strategies related to content, algorithm, user choice, and feedback. We discuss corresponding implications for designing user support, highlighting the importance of user control and explanations of output, not processes. Our work thus contributes empirical evidence to facilitate understanding of users' everyday problems with intelligent systems.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretability
CHI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 100%
Shared Interest: Measuring Human-AI Alignment to Identify Recurring Patterns in Model Behavior
CHI '22· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 100%
Debiased-CAM to mitigate image perturbations with faithful visual explanations of machine learning
CHI '22· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 100%
Progressive Disclosure: Empirically Motivated Approaches to Designing Effective Transparency
IUI '19· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 80%
Explanations as Mechanisms for Supporting Algorithmic Transparency
CHI '18· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 80%
Trends and Trajectories for Explainable, Accountable and Intelligible Systems: An HCI Research Agenda
CHI '18· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 80%
The Disagreement Deconvolution: Bringing Machine Learning Performance Metrics In Line With Reality
CHI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 80%
HILL: A Hallucination Identifier for Large Language Models
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 75%
From Philosophy to Interfaces: an Explanatory Method and a Tool Inspired by Achinstein’s Theory of Explanation
IUI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 75%
Visual, textual or hybrid: the effect of user experience on different explanations
IUI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)