What Data Should I Protect? Recommender and Planning Support for Data Security Analysts
Authors
Major breaches of sensitive company data, as for Facebook's 50 million user accounts in 2018 or Equifax's 143 million user accounts in 2017, are showing the limitations of reactive data security technologies. Companies and government organizations are turning to proactive data security technologies that secure sensitive data at source. However, data security analysts still face two fundamental challenges in data protection decisions: 1) the information overload from the growing number of data repositories and protection techniques to consider; 2) the optimization of protection plans given the current goals and available resources in the organization. In this work, we propose an intelligent user interface for security analysts that recommends what data to protect, visualizes simulated protection impact, and helps build protection plans. In a domain with limited access to expert users and practices, we elicited user requirements from security analysts in industry and modeled data risks based on architectural and conceptual attributes. Our preliminary evaluation suggests that the design improves the understanding and trust of the recommended protections and helps convert risk information in protection plans.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 75%
‘We Do Not Have the Capacity to Monitor All Media’: A Design Case Study on Cyber Situational Awareness in Computer Emergency Response Teams
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +3
- 71%
Certified But Imperfect: Investigating The Role of AI Certifications And System Performance on Trust in And Reliance on AI Systems
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 71%
Beyond the Checkbox: Strengthening DSA Compliance Through Social Media Algorithmic Auditing
CHI '26· Algorithmic Transparency & Auditability +2
- 63%
From Fragmentation to Integration: Exploring the Design Space of AI Agents for Human-as-the-Unit Privacy Management
CHI '26· Privacy by Design & User Control +3
- 63%
Tool-Assisted CVSS Vulnerability Scoring: A Controlled Quantitative Study of Human Assessment
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +3
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)