The HEART Interface: Visualizing Risk Score Uncertainty in the Cardiothoracic ICU
Authors
Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds significant potential for supporting clinical decision-making, particularly in high-pressure environments, such as Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Units (CT-ICU). Care teams in these settings face challenges such as alarm fatigue, rapid staff turnover, time-sensitive decisions, and an overwhelming amount of data. AI-driven Clinical Decision-Support Systems (AI-CDSS) can support care teams in overcoming some of these challenges by providing solutions like detecting and reporting risk scores for adverse events that may lead to increased fatalities or re-admissions, enabling timely intervention. One key challenge with risk scores is missing data, which can create considerable uncertainty in risk score values. AI-CDSSs rarely convey the risk score uncertainty, which is important in the effectiveness and reliability of clinical decision-making. In this paper, we describe the interface design process for HEART, an AI-powered system developed collaboratively with clinical and AI experts over a 16-month iterative design process for a hospital's CT-ICU. The HEART interactive interface integrates understandable visualizations of risk scores and their uncertainty within both a holistic view of all patients in the unit and detailed patient-specific views. We reflect on the user-centered design process, report findings from an expert walkthrough study, and discuss lessons learned as well as broader implications. This work contributes valuable insights into uncertainty visualization design for AI-derived risk scores in a critical care application. Beyond these specific insights, our work illustrates the kind of comprehensive, human-centered design process necessary for responsible AI adoption in critical environments. Supplemental Material, including a video demo of the HEART interface and additional details on the algorithm, is available on the project's OSF repository: https://osf.io/akqx8/.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
No related papers with ≥60% similarity
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)