CLEAR: Towards Contextual LLM-Empowered Privacy Policy Analysis and Risk Generation for Large Language Model Applications
Authors
The rise of end-user applications powered by large language models (LLMs), including both conversational interfaces and add-ons to existing graphical user interfaces (GUIs), introduces new privacy challenges. However, many users remain unaware of the risks. This paper explores methods to increase user awareness of privacy risks associated with LLMs in end-user applications. We conducted five co-design workshops to uncover user privacy concerns and their demand for contextual privacy information within LLMs. Based on these insights, we developed CLEAR (Contextual LLM-Empowered Privacy Policy Analysis and Risk Generation), a just-in-time contextual assistant designed to help users identify sensitive information, summarize relevant privacy policies, and highlight potential risks when sharing information with LLMs. We evaluated the usability and usefulness of CLEAR across two example domains: ChatGPT and the Gemini plugin in Gmail. Our findings demonstrated that CLEAR is easy to use and improves users' understanding of data practices and privacy risks. We also discussed LLM's duality in posing and mitigating privacy risks, offering design and policy implications.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How can privacy risks when LLMs process user input be reduced?Category: Privacy Policy, Notice, and Terms ComprehensionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Can real-time, context-relevant privacy information enhance users' understanding of privacy risks?Category: Privacy Policy, Notice, and Terms ComprehensionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- What methods can simplify complex privacy policies and improve usability for users?Category: Privacy Policy, Notice, and Terms ComprehensionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Ordinary users struggle to recognize privacy risks when interacting with LLMs.Category: Privacy Policy, Notice, and Terms ComprehensionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 86%
When Feasibility of Fairness Audits Relies on Willingness to Share Data: Examining User Acceptance of Multi-Party Computation Protocols for Fairness Monitoring
CHI '26· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +2
- 86%
Do Citizens Agree with the EU AI Act? Public Perspectives on Risk and Regulation of AI Systems
CHI '26· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +2
- 71%
A Psychometric Scale to Measure Individuals' Value of Other People's Privacy (VOPP)
CHI '23· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +2
- 63%
Exploring Design and Governance Challenges in the Development of Privacy-Preserving Computation
CHI '21· Privacy by Design & User Control +2
- 63%
Deepfakes, Phrenology, Surveillance, and More! A Taxonomy of AI Privacy Risks
CHI '24· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +2
- 63%
Exploring What People Need to Know to be AI Literate: Tailoring for a Diversity of AI Roles and Responsibilities
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 63%
Can AI Be a Moral Victim? The Role of Moral Patiency and Ownership Perceptions in Ethical Judgments of Using AI-Generated Content
CHI '26· Generative AI (Text, Image, Music, Video) +2
- 63%
Decomposing Autonomy: Explaining AI Technology Acceptance Through a Liberty-Based Framework
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 63%
Certified AI System = Trustworthy? Exploring Expert and Lay User Perceptions and Needs Regarding AI Certification
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 63%
What is Safety? Corporate Discourse, Power, and the Politics of Generative AI Safety
CHI '26· Generative AI (Text, Image, Music, Video) +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)