A Design Space of Behavior Change Interventions for Responsible Data Science
Authors
Behavior change theories, rooted in psychology and sociology, offer valuable insights into why and how individuals and groups modify their actions and decisions. By leveraging these theories in the context of responsible data science, we can better understand and influence the behaviors of data scientists, who play a central role in ensuring ethical outcomes by collecting data, developing, and deploying models. In this paper, we present a comprehensive design space for behavior change interventions aimed at promoting responsible behaviors in data science, structured around the 5W1H interrogative framework (Why, Who, What, When, Where, and How). This framework provides a practical guide for developing effective interventions designed to promote responsible behaviors in data science. We showcase the usability of this design space by using it to characterize existing responsible data science intervention tools. We further demonstrate its utility through two usage scenarios to show how the design space can be applied during the ideation phase for building effective tools to foster responsible data science practices. Our work equips the data science community with resources to create effective interventions that not only ensure technical excellence but also foster ethical responsibility, ultimately benefiting society through the responsible use of data.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How can behavior change theories (e.g., Fogg Behavior Model, COM-B model) be applied to data science for responsible data practices?Category: Responsible Data Practices and Behavior InterventionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can the design space of existing behavior intervention tools be partitioned and optimized to improve practicality and coverage?Category: Responsible Data Practices and Behavior InterventionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can behavior interventions be effectively implemented at different stages of the data science lifecycle?Category: Responsible Data Practices and Behavior InterventionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Data science practitioners struggle to translate ethical responsibility into executable behavior patterns.Category: Responsible Data Practices and Behavior InterventionSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 67%
Emerging Data Practices: Data Work in the Era of Large Language Models
CHI '25· Generative AI (Text, Image, Music, Video) +2
- 60%
The Landscape and Gaps in Open Source Fairness Toolkits
CHI '21· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
Towards Fairness in Practice: A Practitioner-Oriented Rubric for Evaluating Fair ML Toolkits
CHI '21· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning Models
CHI '22· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
Capable but Amoral? Comparing AI and Human Expert Collaboration in Ethical Decision Making
CHI '22· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
Out of Context: Investigating the Bias and Fairness Concerns of "Artificial Intelligence as a Service"
CHI '23· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
“It is currently hodgepodge”: Examining AI/ML Practitioners’ Challenges during Co-production of Responsible AI Values
CHI '23· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
STILE: Exploring and Debugging Social Biases in Pre-trained Text Representations
CHI '24· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
Responsibility Attribution in Human Interactions with Everyday AI Systems
CHI '25· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 60%
Robots, Chatbots, Self-Driving Cars: Perceptions of Mind and Morality Across Artificial Intelligences
CHI '25· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)