Benefits of Machine Learning Explanations: Improved Learning in an AI-assisted Sequence Prediction Task
Authors
Research in Explainable AI (XAI) has shown that explanations can improve users' understanding of AI models, improve user performance and potentially reduce overreliance on AI predictions. However, this is mostly evaluated by static rather than dynamic measures, and the role of XAI on learning over trials is rarely studied. In this study, we use a context-free sequence prediction task, in which 458 participants predict the next symbol in a fixed sequence (with some noise) over 80 trials. We compare performance with AI and XAI advice against no AI support, and subsequently we test for learning by taking away the AI support after 40 trials (i.e., a reversal study design). Our results show that users learn faster with XAI than with AI without explanations or no AI and are better able to recover in performance from the removal of AI. However, the benefits of XAI on learning are much smaller for more difficult tasks. This work demonstrates the benefits of repeated measures user studies and multilevel modeling to better understand learning processes in XAI. It also shows the potential of AI explanations to help users to learn and poses XAI design suggestions to support learning in human-AI collaboration.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How does explainable AI (XAI) affect users' learning processes in dynamic interactive environments?Category: XAI Explanation and Appropriate Reliance CalibrationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Are users' trust and comprehension significantly improved through XAI explanations during tasks?Category: XAI Explanation and Appropriate Reliance CalibrationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How does task complexity affect XAI's learning facilitation effects?Category: XAI Explanation and Appropriate Reliance CalibrationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Users struggle to develop long-term learning capacity through sustained interaction with AI.Category: XAI Explanation and Appropriate Reliance CalibrationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 100%
Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance
CHI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 100%
One AI Does Not Fit All: A Cluster Analysis of the Laypeople’s Perception of AI Roles
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 100%
"Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI Interaction
CHI '23· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 100%
Editable XAI: Toward Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment with Co-Editable Explanations of Interpretable Attributes
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 100%
Emergent, not Immanent: A Baradian Reading of Explainable AI
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 100%
Automated Rationale Generation: a Technique for Explainable AI and its Effects on Human Perceptions
IUI '19· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 100%
The Effects of Example-Based Explanations in a Machine Learning Interface
IUI '19· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 100%
Are Explanations Helpful? A Comparative Study of the Effects of Explanations in AI-Assisted Decision-Making
IUI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 100%
Personalising AI Assistance Based on Overreliance Rate in AI-Assisted Decision Making
IUI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 100%
Counterfactual Explanations May Not Be the Best Algorithmic Recourse Approach
IUI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)