Can an AI Partner Empower Learners to Ask Critical Questions?
Jill Watson is an LLM-powered conversational AI partner integrated with instructor-provided courseware, offering learners contextually relevant and immediately applicable support. This study examines learner-generated questions as part of organic interactions with Jill embedded within classroom Learning Management System and investigates whether Jill empowers learners to ask higher-order questions. Leveraging Bloom’s Taxonomy to assess question complexity, we collected over 5500 student questions from classroom deployments across three academic semesters and two educational settings. Student questions were classified using a fine-tuned BERT model and regression models were used to analyze the trends of complexity of the questions over time. Our results reveal a significant proportion of higher-order questions being asked in our classrooms, exceeding typical educational distributions. We also found a statistically significant increase in higher-order questioning with sustained interaction with Jill. These findings demonstrate that Jill empowers learners to engage in critical questioning, thereby enhancing their educational experience by promoting depth, relevance, and application of course concepts. Further research is recommended with larger and more diverse samples to generalize these findings.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 100%
Classroom Simulacra: Building Contextual Student Generative Agents in Online Education for Learning Behavioral Simulation
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 100%
Good Fences Make Good Learning: How Self-Directed Language Learners Navigate LLM Delegation Decisions
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 100%
AskNow: An LLM-powered Interactive System for Real-Time Question Answering in Large-Scale Classrooms
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 100%
AI meets Mathematics Education: Supporting Instructors in Large Mathematics Classes with Context-Aware AI
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 80%
An Interaction Design for Machine Teaching to Develop AI Tutors
CHI '20· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 80%
Charting the Future of AI in Project-Based Learning: A Co-Design Exploration with Students
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 80%
Unlocking Scientific Concepts: How Effective Are LLM-Generated Analogies for Student Understanding and Classroom Practice?
CHI '25· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 80%
Supporting Learners' Use of Imperfect Generative Pedagogical Chatbots: The Role of Chatbot Response Uncertainty and Reduced Verbosity
CHI '26· Conversational Chatbots +2
- 80%
An Empirical Study to Understand How Students Use ChatGPT for Writing Essays
CHI '26· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 80%
Who You Explain To Matters: Learning by Explaining to Conversational Agents with Different Pedagogical Roles
CHI '26· Intelligent Tutoring Systems & Learning Analytics +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)