Benefits of Human-AI Interaction for Expert Users Interacting with Prediction Models: a Study on Marathon Running
Authors
Users with large domain knowledge can be reluctant to use prediction models. This also applies to the sports domain, where running coaches rarely rely on marathon prediction tools for race-plan advice for their runners' next marathon. This paper studies the effect of adding interactivity to such prediction models, to incorporate and acknowledge users' domain knowledge. In think-aloud sessions and an online study, we tested an interactive machine learning tool that allowed coaches to indicate the importance of earlier races feeding into the model. Our results show that coaches deploy rich knowledge when working with the model on runners familiar to them, and their adaptations improved model accuracy. Those coaches who could interact with the model displayed more trust and acceptance in the resulting predictions.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How does model interactivity affect marathon coaches' trust in and acceptance of AI?Category: AI Trust in Education and Learning ContextsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Does the interactive model differentially affect coaches' evaluation of familiar versus unfamiliar athletes' performance?Category: AI Trust in Education and Learning ContextsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Does prediction model accuracy improve through coach interaction?Category: AI Trust in Education and Learning ContextsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Marathon coaches struggle to trust and use AI prediction tools for decision-making.Category: AI Trust in Education and Learning ContextsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
No related papers with ≥60% similarity
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)