Annota: Peer-based AI Hints Towards Learning Qualitative Coding at Scale
Authors
Learning qualitative analysis requires personalized feedback and in-depth discussion not possible for educators to provide in a large course, resulting in many students obtaining only a shallow exposure to qualitative user research and interpretative skills. To overcome this challenge, we introduce a learnersourcing method that builds on the Dawid-Skene expectation maximization (EM) algorithm to generate peer-based AI hints that support students in one aspect of qualitative analysis: determining what sentences are relevant to the research question. After one annotation round, class-wide annotations are used to predict relevant sentences and to generate hints prompting students to revisit missed or incorrectly annotated sentences. An in-the-wild deployment within a large course (N=122) showed that our algorithm converged to comparatively high accuracy despite noisy student labels, and after only ~20 students. An analysis of student interviews found that peer-based AI hints helped improve understanding of research questions, led to more careful examination of transcript annotations, and improved understanding of when they were over-annotating or under-annotating the transcript.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How can students be effectively supported in learning qualitative coding in large-scale courses?Category: Training Feedback and Skill ImprovementSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Can AI-generated peer-data-based prompts help students improve qualitative analysis skills?Category: Training Feedback and Skill ImprovementSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How does AI prompting using the DS-EM algorithm perform in improving students' cognition and reflection?Category: Training Feedback and Skill ImprovementSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Students in large-scale courses lack practice and feedback for learning qualitative analysis.Category: Training Feedback and Skill ImprovementSimilar questionsarrow_forward
No related papers with ≥60% similarity
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)