Interacting with a Social Robot Affects Visual Perception of Space
Honorable MentionAuthors
Human partners are very effective at coordinating in space and time. Such ability is particular remarkable considering that visual perception of space is a complex inferential process, which is affected by individual prior experience (e.g. the history of previous stimuli). As a result, two partners might perceive differently the same stimulus. Yet, they find a way to align their perception, as demonstrated by the high degree of coordination observed in sports or even in everyday gestures as shaking hands. Robots would need a similar ability to align with their partner's perception. However, to date there is no knowledge of how the inferential mechanism supporting visual perception operates during social interaction. In the current work, we use a humanoid robot to address this question. We replicate a standard protocol for the quantification of perceptual inference in a HRI setting. Participants estimated the length of a set of segments presented by the humanoid robot iCub. The robot behaved in one condition as a mechanical arm driven by a computer and in another condition as an interactive, social partner. Even if the stimuli presented were the same in the two conditions, length perception was different when the robot was judged as an interactive agent rather than a mechanical tool. When playing with the social robot, participants relied significantly less on stimulus history. This result suggests that the brain changes optimization strategies during interaction and lay the foundations to design humanaware robot visual perception.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 75%
Reading Between the Pixels: Investigating the Barriers to Visualization Literacy
CHI '24· Visualization Perception & Cognition
- 75%
Did You Misclick? Reversing 5-Point Satisfaction Scales Causes Unintended Responses
CHI '24· Visualization Perception & Cognition
- 60%
TopoText: Context-Preserving Text Data Exploration Across Multiple Spatial Scales
CHI '18· Interactive Data Visualization +1
- 60%
How Do We Measure That?! Quick Scale Development
CHI '18· Visualization Perception & Cognition +1
- 60%
BubbleView: An Interface for Crowdsourcing Image Importance Maps and Tracking Visual Attention
CHI '18· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 60%
Understanding Digitally-Mediated Empathy: An Exploration of Visual, Narrative, and Biosensory Informational Cues
CHI '19· Visualization Perception & Cognition +1
- 60%
The Low/High Index of Pupillary Activity
CHI '20· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
- 60%
How Relevant is Hick's Law for HCI?
CHI '20· Visualization Perception & Cognition +1
- 60%
How Visualizing Inferential Uncertainty Can Mislead Readers About Treatment Effects in Scientific Results
CHI '20· Uncertainty Visualization +1
- 60%
Rethinking Eye-blink: Assessing Task Difficulty through Physiological Representation of Spontaneous Blinking
CHI '21· Eye Tracking & Gaze Interaction +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)