The integration of AI into decision-making processes offers substantial benefits, particularly in enhancing accuracy and efficiency. However, long-term consequences, such as over-reliance, skill erosion, and loss of human agency, present significant challenges. This study investigates various human-AI collaboration protocols~--~traditional, inhibition, displacement, and replacement~--~across multiple medical settings, including radiological imaging, ECG, and endoscopy. We introduce a novel framework that includes a choice nomogram and qualitative assessment tool, designed to optimize both decision accuracy and socio-technical impacts. Our findings reveal that the displacement protocol consistently outperformed others in several contexts, achieving 87\% accuracy in MRI analysis, 89\% in x-ray reading and 85\% in endoscopy; conversely, the traditional protocol was most effective only in ECG analysis, with 82\% accuracy. These results demonstrate that no single protocol is universally optimal, highlighting the need for context-specific selection to ensure effective and sustainable AI-supported decision-making, with a focus on balancing short-term performance with long-term human factors.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/cscw/211017/2025

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CSCW
calendar_month
Year
2025
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
7 authors
sell
Subtopics
—
work
Professions
—
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers