Embodying the Algorithm: Exploring Relationships with Large Language Models Through Artistic Performance
Authors
Title of the Paper
Embodying the Algorithm: Exploring Relationships with Large Language Models Through Artistic Performance
Paper Information
- Subject Area: Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Algorithm Studies, Large Language Models (LLMs), and Artistic Performance
- Keywords: embodiment, human-computer interaction, GPT-3, algorithm, performance art, sense-making, AI collaboration, physicality, artistic research, agency
Research Background and Problems
-
Issues or Challenges:
- Despite the widespread application of algorithmic systems in human life, there is limited research focusing on the "materiality" and "physicality" of human-algorithm interaction processes.
- Current algorithms (especially LLMs like GPT-3) often generate instructions that overlook human physical limitations, directly or indirectly leading to failures in "collaboration" with humans.
- In various contexts, humans tend to anthropomorphize algorithms, attributing intentions and meanings to them, even though algorithms lack such capabilities.
- Existing studies on algorithmic behavior primarily focus on technical design aspects, with insufficient exploration of their impact on physical and sensory experiences.
-
Significance of the Research:
- Modern algorithms are deeply embedded in social life, such as content recommendation, advertising, voice assistants, etc., shaping human behaviors and lifestyles.
- Exploring the interaction and physicality between humans and algorithms can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the social effects of algorithms, particularly the possibilities and limitations of human-algorithm collaboration.
- The study can reveal the inequalities and risks arising from algorithms neglecting human physicality and complex social contexts.
-
Research Motivation:
- The study proposes a novel approach to interacting with algorithms through artistic performance, aiming to uncover how these algorithms influence human experiences and how humans respond through their embodied preconceptions.
Solution
-
Methods or Solutions:
- The authors conducted an experimental project called "Embodying the Algorithm", combining artistic research with human-computer interaction analysis. Specifically:
- Artistic Performance: Professional performance artists were invited to engage in endurance performances based on GPT-3-generated instructions.
- Embodiment Experiments: By having performance artists "execute" the generated texts physically, the study explored the direct impact of algorithm-generated instructions on the body and captured how humans reflect and interpret these instructions through their physicality.
- Multimodal Relationship Analysis: The interactions between artists and GPT-3 were categorized into three possible relational modes (relationships with the algorithm rather than collaboration).
- The authors conducted an experimental project called "Embodying the Algorithm", combining artistic research with human-computer interaction analysis. Specifically:
-
Innovative Aspects:
- Designing extreme algorithm-generated instructions to interact with human physical boundaries, breaking the traditional "abstract" limitations of algorithm studies.
- Using endurance performance as a method to explore the tension and meaning-making between the human body and algorithms.
- Deep analysis of the infeasibility of traditional "collaboration" between humans and algorithms.
-
Implementation Steps:
- Instruction Generation: Using GPT-3 to generate a set of performance instructions (via "artistic performance input text prompts").
- Experimental Design: Five performers selected instructions, interpreted them, and recorded their performances.
- Qualitative Interviews: The study collected data through in-depth interviews and performance observations to analyze how participating artists interpreted and responded to GPT-3.
- Data Analysis: Patterns of interaction were summarized and analyzed based on interviews and performance results.
-
Key Technologies:
- GPT-3 as a language generation model to produce initial performance instructions.
- Artistic research methods as tools for knowledge production supporting the experimental framework.
Research Findings
-
Specific Findings:
-
Three Modes of Human-Algorithm Relationships:
- Agonistic Mode: When instructions ignored physical limitations, performers resisted and reshaped the instructions, expressing defiance.
- Perfunctory Mode: Performers mechanically completed tasks without emotional engagement or speculation about the algorithm's intentions.
- Agreeable Mode: Performers occasionally exhibited "pleasurable" compliance with the algorithm, though this was often a misjudgment, assuming the algorithm could understand or respond.
-
Key Methods for Perceiving Generated Patterns:
- Reflexivity, interpretation, and personification were employed to sense and interpret algorithmic text results, despite humans persistently attributing "intentions" to the algorithm.
-
Tensions Between Algorithms and Physical Limitations:
- GPT-3-generated instructions showed a lack of concern for the executing subject, such as ignoring physiological fatigue or even life-threatening scenarios—e.g., instructions involving resurrection after death.
-
-
Advantages Compared to Existing Research:
- The study offers a unique perspective on the direct impact of algorithms on the human body, addressing the shortcomings of overly "abstract" algorithm studies.
- It explores conflicts between algorithms and material, sensory, and physical dimensions, providing important insights for designing fair algorithms.
-
Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- Performers demonstrated the ability to respond to the algorithm's "misunderstanding" of human limitations, such as creatively interpreting and modifying original instructions to mitigate their harshness.
- The study clearly revealed that "collaborating with algorithms" is a false proposition in the context of current large language models, as algorithms lack genuine intentions and feedback capabilities.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- Limitations:
- Only five performance artists participated, with limited sample size and diversity.
- The study focused on the GPT-3 model, which may not fully generalize to other algorithms.
- Future Directions:
- Expanding research to diverse populations and contexts, focusing on how different individuals "reinterpret" algorithmic behavior.
- Exploring mechanisms that allow users to resist algorithmic rules, reducing social risks.
- Limitations:
Through this study, the authors proposed a multidimensional analytical framework for human-algorithm interaction, while cautioning against the ethical and practical consequences of considering "human-like mimicry" in algorithm design. This provides important references for future technology design and policy-making.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- In artistic performance, how do GPT-3-generated instructions interact with performers' bodily materiality?Category: LLM Interfaces, Prompts, and Interaction UnderstandingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do performers respond to and interpret algorithmically generated dehumanizing instructions through bodily reactions?Category: LLM Interfaces, Prompts, and Interaction UnderstandingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- What relationship patterns can emerge in human interaction with large language models (e.g., GPT-3)?Category: LLM Interfaces, Prompts, and Interaction UnderstandingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Creative professionals struggle to collaborate when algorithms generate instructions that ignore human bodily constraints.Category: LLM Interfaces, Prompts, and Interaction UnderstandingSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)