AI Shall Have No Dominion: on How to Measure Technology Dominance in AI-supported Human Decision Making
Authors
In this article, we propose a conceptual and methodological framework for measuring the impact of the introduction of AI systems in decision settings, based on the concept of technological dominance, i.e. the influence that an AI system can exert on human judgment and decisions. We distinguish between a negative component of dominance (automation bias) and a positive one (algorithm appreciation) by focusing on and systematizing the patterns of interaction between human judgment and AI support, or reliance patterns, and their associated cognitive effects. We then define statistical approaches for measuring these dimensions of dominance, as well as corresponding qualitative visualizations. By reporting about four medical case studies, we illustrate how the proposed methods can be used to inform assessments of dominance and of related cognitive biases in real-world settings. Our study lays the groundwork for future investigations into the effects of introducing AI support into naturalistic and collaborative decision-making.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 83%
Risk, Data, Alignment: Making Credit Scoring Work in Kenya
CHI '26· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
- 67%
Aspirations and Practice of ML Model Documentation: Moving the Needle with Nudging and Traceability
CHI '23· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
- 67%
From plane crashes to algorithmic harm: applicability of safety engineering frameworks for responsible ML
CHI '23· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +2
- 60%
For What It's Worth: Humans Overwrite Their Economic Self-Interest to Avoid Bargaining With AI Systems
CHI '22· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)