Assisting with Fingertip Force Control by Active Bio-Acoustic Sensing and Electrical Muscle Stimulation

Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin StimulationElectrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS)

Title of the Paper

Assisting with Fingertip Force Control by Active Bio-Acoustic Sensing and Electrical Muscle Stimulation

Paper Information

  • Research Area: Human-Computer Interaction, Fingertip Force Control Assistance Based on Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS) and Active Bio-Acoustic Sensing
  • Keywords: Electrical Muscle Stimulation, Active Bio-Acoustic Sensing, Closed-Loop Control, Fingertip Force, Pinch Force

Research Background and Problem

  • Problem:
    • Fingertip force control is crucial for learning motor skills, such as in golf, surgical operations, and other precision tasks.
    • Existing solutions, such as exoskeleton gloves, cover the fingers and interfere with users' finger movement control and tactile feedback.
    • Current solutions using surface electromyography (EMG) sensors do not require finger-mounted devices but are susceptible to noise from EMS electrical signals.
  • Significance:
    • Focuses on fingertip force assistance devices that do not hinder hand flexibility or tactile feedback, aiding in the enhancement of motor skills.
  • Research Motivation and Related Work:
    • Existing studies primarily focus on guiding users' posture and movements through EMS, with limited exploration of closed-loop control for fingertip force.
    • Active Bio-Acoustic Sensing (ABAS) is a relatively new sensing technology capable of distinguishing different hand movements and force levels.

Solution

  • Method and Principle:
    • Proposed a wearable system that estimates fingertip force through active bio-acoustic sensing and incorporates electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) for unconscious force control.
    • The system uses piezoelectric elements (located on the back of the hand) for force estimation and EMS (applied to the forearm) for feedback in force control.
  • Innovations:
    • The system does not require devices to be worn on the fingers, preserving finger flexibility and tactile integrity.
    • ABAS is insensitive to EMS electrical signals, enabling collaborative operation within the same system.
  • Key Technologies and Implementation:
    1. Active Bio-Acoustic Sensing:
      • Utilizes two piezoelectric elements (one emitting sound waves and the other receiving vibration responses) to estimate pinch force.
      • Processes feature vectors using machine learning regression models (Support Vector Regression, SVR, or Gaussian Process Regression, GPR).
    2. Electrical Muscle Stimulation:
      • Employs Pulse Frequency Modulation (PFM) for closed-loop control of EMS intensity, stimulating target muscles (flexor pollicis longus, extensor pollicis longus).
      • Adjusts EMS using proportional control or switch control methods.
    3. Hardware Prototypes:
      • Designed three hardware prototypes: fixed with medical tape, embedded in a wristband frame, and integrated into a fingerless glove.
      • All three prototypes can estimate forces at different target levels.

Research Outcomes

  • Specific Results:
    • The system effectively assists users in pinch force control at different target levels (e.g., light force 3N, medium force 6N) using EMS, significantly reducing errors.
    • The system does not require devices to cover the fingers, maintaining tactile feedback while achieving interactive and precise force control.
  • Experimental and Evaluation Results:
    • For force estimation accuracy, the average error of the three prototypes ranged from 0.91 to 1.38N, with correlation coefficients of approximately 0.86 to 0.93.
    • In user studies, most participants showed significantly reduced force errors at low to medium target force levels.
    • Performance was limited in dynamic environments (e.g., golf putting tests) and at high target force levels (e.g., 9N), likely due to limitations in force estimation accuracy.
  • Advantages Compared to Existing Solutions:
    • Compared to exoskeleton gloves or EMG-based methods, the system addresses issues of device interference with hand movements or tactile feedback.
    • The combination of EMS and ABAS enables closed-loop and real-time force control without the need to redesign force feedback hardware.
  • Limitations and Future Directions:
    • Current force estimation is sensitive to motion artifacts, reducing accuracy in dynamic conditions.
    • The system requires extensive calibration for different environments and users, necessitating large datasets to improve model robustness.
    • Future plans include enhancing the estimation model with deep learning implementations, optimizing hardware portability, and extending applications to more complex fingertip force control scenarios (e.g., piano playing).

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/95936/2023

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581192
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2023
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
2 authors
sell
Subtopics
Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation, Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS)
work
Professions
—
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
3 related papers