Leveraging Distal Vibrotactile Feedback for Target Acquisition

Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin StimulationFoot & Wrist InteractionSoftware Engineers & DevelopersPersonal Trainers & Fitness Coaches

Many touch based interactions provide limited opportunities for direct tactile feedback; examples include multi-user touch displays, augmented reality based projections on passive surfaces, and mid-air input. In this paper, we consider distal feedback, through vibrotactile stimulation on a smart-watch placed on the user's non-dominant wrist, as an alternative feedback mechanism to interaction location vibrotactile feedback, under the user's finger. We compare the effectiveness of interaction location feedback vs. distal feedback through a Fitts's Law task completed on a smartphone. Results show that distal and interaction location feedback both reduce errors in target acquisition and exhibit statistically comparable performance, suggesting that distal vibrotactile feedback is a suitable alternative when interaction location feedback is not readily available.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/7243/2019

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2019
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
4 authors
sell
Subtopics
Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation, Foot & Wrist Interaction
work
Professions
Software Engineers & Developers, Personal Trainers & Fitness Coaches
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers