“Genderfluid” or “Attack helicopter”: Responsible HCI Research Practice with Non-binary Gender Variation in Online Communities

Gender & Race Issues in HCITechnology Ethics & Critical HCIHCI ResearchersSociologists & Anthropologists

As non-binary genders become increasingly prevalent, researchers face decisions in how to collect, analyze and interpret research participants’ genders. We present two case studies on surveys with thousands of respondents, of which hundreds reported gender as something other than simply women or men. First, Tumblr, a blogging platform, resulted in a rich set of gender identities with very few aggressive or resistive responses; the second case study, online Fantasy Football, yielded opposite proportions. By focusing on variation rather than dismissing non-binary responses as noise, we suggest that researchers can better capture gender in a way that 1) addresses gender variation without othering or erasing non-binary respondents; and 2) minimizes “trolls’” opportunity to use surveys as a mischief platform. The analyses of these two distinct case studies find significant gender differences in community dimensions of participation in both networked spaces as well as offering a model for inclusive mixed-methods HCI research.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/6022/2018

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2018
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
4 authors
sell
Subtopics
Gender & Race Issues in HCI, Technology Ethics & Critical HCI
work
Professions
HCI Researchers, Sociologists & Anthropologists
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers