WallTokens: Surface Tangibles for Vertical Displays
Shape-Changing Interfaces & Soft Robotic MaterialsShape-Changing Materials & 4D PrintingUI/UX DesignersProduct Designers
Paper Title
WallTokens: Surface Tangibles for Vertical Displays
Paper Information
- Topic Area: Tangible interaction design for horizontal and vertical display surfaces
- Keywords: Tangible Interaction, Tokens, Wall-sized display, Fabrication, Multi-touch gestures
Research Background and Problem
- Problem or Challenge: Interaction design for vertical displays faces challenges due to gravity. Compared to tangible operations on horizontal surfaces, traditional touch gestures lack precision and sensitivity on vertical displays, and are less conducive to multi-user collaboration.
- Importance: Providing more precise and flexible interaction methods on high-resolution large screens has significant practical value, especially for collaborative applications.
- Research Motivation and Related Work:
- Tangible interaction methods have demonstrated notable advantages on horizontal display surfaces, such as supporting eyes-free control and enhancing collaborative awareness. However, research on their application to vertical screens is limited.
- Existing solutions are mostly based on touch gestures or external tracking systems, which struggle to efficiently integrate multi-user and multi-modal operations on vertical screens.
Solution
- Proposed Method and Innovation:
- A new tangible interaction device called WallTokens is introduced, made using lightweight passive hardware components and 3D printing technology. Combined with suction cup design, it enables operations on vertical displays.
- WallTokens can identify "patterns" (token footprints) at touch points on the wall, allowing for positioning, rotation, and attach/release operations.
- Innovative Features:
- The use of suction cups addresses gravity challenges, supporting quick attachment and release functions, enabling users to efficiently switch between tangible operations and touch gestures.
- Provides a low-cost, easily manufacturable prototype model, reducing the technical barriers for expanding tangible interaction development.
- Implementation Steps and Key Technologies:
- Use 3D printing technology to fabricate modular components (e.g., push-pull handles, suction cup connectors).
- Develop a touch point pattern matching algorithm to enable WallTokens identity and state recognition.
- Conduct user experiments to validate the operational precision and performance of WallTokens.
Research Outcomes
- Specific Results:
- WallTokens demonstrated interaction advantages on vertical displays, allowing users to perform more precise operations on virtual objects.
- User experiments showed that WallTokens outperformed touch gestures in terms of operational efficiency (task completion time reduced by approximately 26%), fluidity, and comfort.
- A development framework based on the TUIO protocol was provided, supporting prototype application extensions and multi-user scenarios.
- Comparison with Existing Solutions:
- Compared to traditional touch gestures, WallTokens offer a more flexible continuous operation experience. Compared to tangible interactions on horizontal surfaces, they effectively address gravity limitations on vertical displays.
- Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- Experiments designed with virtual objects of varying sizes and rotation angles verified that WallTokens maintain high performance even for small object manipulation.
- Experiments demonstrated WallTokens' advantages in reducing friction, supporting complex postures, and facilitating collaborative communication.
- Limitations and Future Directions:
- Limitations: The suction cup design is only applicable to smooth surfaces, and the freedom of tangible manipulation depends on hardware structure.
- Future Directions: Explore multi-modal interaction technologies combining gestures; incorporate wireless tracking methods to support remote operations.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
help
Research Questions
2- How can a physical interaction device suitable for vertical displays be designed to address gravity-related operational challenges?Category: Mobile Touch and Micro-Gesture InputSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Can WallTokens enable more efficient multi-user and multimodal operations on vertical surfaces than traditional touch gestures?Category: Mobile Touch and Micro-Gesture InputSimilar questionsarrow_forward
lightbulb
Practical Problems
1- Users experience low efficiency and difficulty with precision when using touch gestures on vertical displays.Category: Mobile Touch and Micro-Gesture InputSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 75%
Morphees+: Studying Everyday Reconfigurable Objects for the Design and Taxonomy of Reconfigurable UIs
CHI '18· Shape-Changing Interfaces & Soft Robotic Materials
- 75%
Squish This: Force Input on Soft Surfaces for Visual Targeting Tasks
CHI '21· Shape-Changing Interfaces & Soft Robotic Materials
- 67%
Reconfigurable Interfaces by Shape Change and Embedded Magnets
CHI '24· Force Feedback & Pseudo-Haptic Weight +2
- 67%
OmniFiber: Integrated Fluidic Fiber Actuators for Weaving Movement-based Interactions into the ‘Fabric of Everyday Life’
UIST '21· Haptic Wearables +2
- 60%
Towards Ultra Personalized 4D Printed Shoes
CHI '18· Shape-Changing Interfaces & Soft Robotic Materials +1
- 60%
The Making of Performativity in Designing [with] Smart Material Composites
CHI '18· Shape-Changing Interfaces & Soft Robotic Materials +1
- 60%
PickCells: A Physically Reconfigurable Cell-composed Touchscreen
CHI '19· Shape-Changing Interfaces & Soft Robotic Materials +1
- 60%
A-line: 4D Printing Morphing Linear Composite Structures
CHI '19· Shape-Changing Interfaces & Soft Robotic Materials +1
- 60%
PneuModule: Using Inflatable Pin Arrays for Reconfigurable Physical Controls on Pressure-Sensitive Touch Surfaces
CHI '20· Shape-Changing Interfaces & Soft Robotic Materials +1
- 60%
transTexture Lamp: Understanding Lived Experiences with Deformation Through a Materiality Lens
CHI '20· Shape-Changing Interfaces & Soft Robotic Materials
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)
Quick Actions
AdRecommended
Learn AI Coding at CodeNow
open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445404
At a Glance
fact_checkPaper Snapshot
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2021
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
3 authors
sell
Subtopics
Shape-Changing Interfaces & Soft Robotic Materials, Shape-Changing Materials & 4D Printing
work
Professions
UI/UX Designers, Product Designers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers