ConceptScope: Organizing and Visualizing Knowledge in Documents based on Domain Ontology
Authors
Interactive Data VisualizationData StorytellingHCI ResearchersStatisticians & Data Scientists
Document Title
ConceptScope: Organizing and Visualizing Knowledge in Documents based on Domain Ontology
Document Information
- Research Area: Text visualization, domain ontology, knowledge representation
- Keywords: Visualization, domain ontology, knowledge representation, text analysis, multi-document comparison
Research Background and Problem
- Problem or Challenge:
- Current text visualization tools often rely on intrinsic statistical attributes of documents (e.g., word frequency, word co-occurrence), lacking a conceptual overview that incorporates domain knowledge.
- For domain-specific documents (e.g., research papers, technical reports), a more detailed domain knowledge structure is needed for analysis.
- Importance: Researchers or document analysts frequently need to understand document content from a conceptual perspective and its position within domain knowledge, while also being able to compare similarities and differences between documents.
- Research Motivation and Related Work:
- The proposed research addresses the gap in existing methods that fail to provide a domain knowledge perspective.
- References semantic content visualization tools such as DocuBurst, while extending capabilities to support conceptual hierarchy and comparison for domain-specific documents.
Solution
- Method and Solution: A text visualization method called ConceptScope is proposed, which constructs conceptual relationships in documents based on domain ontology and uses Bubble Treemap to display the distribution and hierarchical structure of domain concepts.
- Innovations:
- Utilizes domain ontology to provide a conceptual rather than statistical overview of text content.
- Supports conceptual-level comparison across multiple documents.
- Introduces interactive visualization for single or multi-document analysis.
- Implementation Steps and Key Techniques:
- Concept Extraction: Uses noun chunking and n-gram techniques to extract term candidates from documents.
- Term Mapping: Applies SPARQL queries and fuzzy matching techniques to map terms to concepts in the domain ontology.
- Hierarchy Reconstruction: Organizes terms into a tree structure based on the hierarchical relationships in the domain ontology.
- User Interface: Displays the conceptual hierarchy using Bubble Treemap, providing multi-perspective interactive views (e.g., text view, key term tooltips).
Research Outcomes
- Specific Outcomes:
- Developed a ConceptScope prototype capable of visualizing computer science papers and technical reports using the Computer Science Ontology (CSO).
- Demonstrated the tool's capabilities for single-document analysis and multi-document comparison in a set of use case scenarios.
- Comparison with Existing Solutions:
- Compared to DocuBurst, ConceptScope excels in domain-focused visualization, grouped word cloud composition, and support for multi-document comparison.
- DocuBurst is more suitable for cross-domain, generalized text exploration.
- Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- Qualitative studies show that ConceptScope performs well in providing conceptual overviews of domain knowledge, exploring new knowledge, and comparing multiple documents.
- However, ConceptScope has weaker support for multi-domain documents.
- Limitations and Future Directions:
- Dependence on domain ontology may limit its flexibility for multi-disciplinary document applications.
- Future plans include supporting the integration of multiple domain ontologies and exploring real-time online text (e.g., forums or technical discussion messages).
Conclusion
- ConceptScope introduces a novel method for document visualization using domain ontology, focusing on providing tools for organizing, analyzing, and comparing complex academic documents and technical reports.
- Results indicate that ConceptScope is better suited for in-depth exploration of domain-specific content compared to existing tools, though improvements are needed to enhance its cross-domain analysis capabilities.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
help
Research Questions
3- How can domain ontologies create conceptual rather than statistical overviews of textual content?Category: Text, Document, and Notebook VisualizationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can domain ontologies support conceptual hierarchical comparison across multiple documents?Category: Text, Document, and Notebook VisualizationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can interactive text visualization tools be designed to help users explore and understand domain literature?Category: Text, Document, and Notebook VisualizationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
lightbulb
Practical Problems
1- Researchers struggle to analyze domain documents and compare their similarities and differences at a conceptual level.Category: Text, Document, and Notebook VisualizationSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 80%
Using Open Data to Automatically Generate Localized Analogies
CHI '24· Interactive Data Visualization +2
- 80%
Idyll Studio: A Structured Editor for Authoring Interactive & Data-Driven Articles
UIST '21· Interactive Data Visualization +1
- 75%
Interactive Context-Preserving Color Highlighting for Multiclass Scatterplots
CHI '23· Interactive Data Visualization
- 67%
Augmenting Static Visualizations with PapARVis Designer
CHI '20· AR Navigation & Context Awareness +2
- 67%
Can Anthropographics Promote Prosociality? A Review and Large-Sample Study
CHI '21· Interactive Data Visualization +2
- 60%
Ranked-List Visualization: A Graphical Perception Study
CHI '19· Data Storytelling +1
- 60%
DataSelfie: Empowering People to Design Personalized Visuals to Represent Their Data
CHI '19· Interactive Data Visualization +1
- 60%
ActiveInk: (Th)Inking with Data
CHI '19· Interactive Data Visualization +1
- 60%
Du Bois Wrapped Bar Chart: Visualizing Categorical Data with Disproportionate Values
CHI '20· Interactive Data Visualization +1
- 60%
Chameleon: Bringing Interactivity to Static Digital Documents
CHI '20· Interactive Data Visualization +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)
Quick Actions
AdRecommended
Learn AI Coding at CodeNow
open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445396
At a Glance
fact_checkPaper Snapshot
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2021
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
3 authors
sell
Subtopics
Interactive Data Visualization, Data Storytelling
work
Professions
HCI Researchers, Statisticians & Data Scientists
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers