Assessing MyData Scenarios: Ethics, Concerns, and the Promise
Authors
Title of the Paper
Assessing MyData Scenarios: Ethics, Concerns, and the Promise
Bibliographic Information
- Authors: Andy Alorwu, Saba Kheirinejad, Niels van Berkel, Marianne Kinnula, Denzil Ferreira, Aku Visuri, Simo Hosio
- Affiliations: University of Oulu (Finland), Aalborg University (Denmark)
- Conference: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2021 (CHI '21)
- Location: Yokohama, Japan
- Keywords: MyData, Ethics, Healthcare, Crowdsourcing, Privacy
Research Background and Problem
- Issues and Challenges: Unethical practices and privacy violations in the use of personal data have become global concerns, such as unauthorized data sharing and illegal data trading.
- Significance: Privacy issues affect individual rights and societal trust, particularly in the healthcare domain. MyData envisions personal control over data, but public awareness and ethical evaluations of specific scenarios require further exploration.
- Research Motivation: To investigate users' ethical perceptions and concerns regarding data management scenarios and to provide insights into data ethics through a combination of theoretical and empirical research.
Solution
- Research Methods: Contextual scenario analysis was employed, utilizing an online crowdsourcing platform to collect user evaluations of the ethics and concerns associated with 96 scenarios. Surveys were also conducted to gather insights on MyData.
- Innovations:
- Designed and implemented a quantitative scenario evaluation method, analyzing user perceptions of ethics and concerns.
- Proposed a comprehensive framework addressing the potential and challenges of MyData in the healthcare sector.
- Quantified the impact of key parameters in personal data management scenarios on ethics and concerns.
- Implementation Steps:
- Phase 1: Data on ethical perceptions and levels of concern regarding scenarios were collected via the Amazon Mechanical Turk platform.
- Phase 2: Participants were invited to complete follow-up surveys to provide qualitative insights, demographic information, and opinions on MyData.
Research Findings
- Key Findings:
- Identified major parameters influencing the ethics and concerns of scenarios, with "whether user consent is obtained" and "data type (e.g., health tracking data)" significantly affecting ethical evaluations.
- Quantitative results indicated that ethics and concerns are independent variables and not necessarily strongly correlated.
- Participants expressed a positive attitude toward personal control over data, particularly in the healthcare domain.
- Qualitative results highlighted concerns about current data misuse and optimism about the application of the MyData vision to health data.
- Advantages:
- Provided the first extensive dataset and analytical framework on user perceptions for the MyData vision and data ethics research.
- Offered insights into designing user-friendly data management interfaces to support MyData practices.
- Experiments and Evaluation:
- Phase 1 collected 1,920 evaluations of 96 scenarios from 172 participants.
- Phase 2 involved 129 participants who provided demographic information and opinions on MyData.
- Limitations and Future Directions:
- Limitations: The sample primarily consisted of MTurk participants, which may lack sufficient diversity to represent a global user base. Ethical orientations such as idealism and relativism were not fully incorporated into the model analysis.
- Future Directions: Investigate user decision-making in real-world data-sharing processes; expand contextual parameters (e.g., family data sharing); explore ethical issues in nonprofit organizations or long-term data management scenarios.
Conclusion
This study revealed differences in user perceptions of the ethics and concerns associated with common data management scenarios and highlighted the potential applications of MyData in global data governance and healthcare. The research holds significant academic and practical value in data ethics, human-centered data interaction design, and related policy development, advancing the frontier of privacy and data usage exploration.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- How do users evaluate ethics and concerns related to personal data management?Category: Medical AI Clinical Support and System Adoption NeedsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Which parameters significantly affect users' evaluations of ethics and concerns in scenarios?Category: Medical AI Clinical Support and System Adoption NeedsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- What potential and challenges does MyData (personal data control) have in healthcare data governance?Category: Medical AI Clinical Support and System Adoption NeedsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Users worry about personal data misuse, especially in healthcare, and lack ethical awareness of scenarios.Category: Medical AI Clinical Support and System Adoption NeedsSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 80%
Relations are more than Bytes: Re-thinking the Benefits of Smart Services through People and Things
CHI '19· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +2
- 80%
Beyond Kant and Bentham: How Ethical Theories are being used in Artificial Moral Agents
CHI '21· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +2
- 80%
A Psychometric Scale to Measure Individuals' Value of Other People's Privacy (VOPP)
CHI '23· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +2
- 67%
Why the Fine, AI? The Effect of Explanation Level on Citizens' Fairness Perception of AI-based Discretion in Public Administrations
CHI '24· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +2
- 67%
Surveilling Suitability: How AI Hiring Interviews Impact Job Seekers with Disabilities
CHI '26· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +2
- 67%
When Feasibility of Fairness Audits Relies on Willingness to Share Data: Examining User Acceptance of Multi-Party Computation Protocols for Fairness Monitoring
CHI '26· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +2
- 67%
Decomposing Autonomy: Explaining AI Technology Acceptance Through a Liberty-Based Framework
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
Certified AI System = Trustworthy? Exploring Expert and Lay User Perceptions and Needs Regarding AI Certification
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
Do Citizens Agree with the EU AI Act? Public Perspectives on Risk and Regulation of AI Systems
CHI '26· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +2
- 67%
“It’s Just a Wild, Wild West”: Harnessing Public Procurement as an AI Governance Mechanism
CHI '26· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)