Whither AutoML? Understanding the Role of Automation in Machine Learning Workflows
Authors
Title of the Paper
Whither AutoML? Understanding the Role of Automation in Machine Learning Workflows
Paper Information
- Subject Area: Automation in Machine Learning and Human-AI Collaboration
- Keywords: Automated Machine Learning, Auto-ML, Human-AI Collaboration, Data Science Workflow, UI Design, Model Transparency, User Experience
Research Background and Problem Statement
-
Identified Problems and Challenges:
- The complexity of machine learning makes it inaccessible to non-experts, involving numerous tedious steps such as model selection, data preprocessing, and feature engineering.
- Automated Machine Learning (Auto-ML) systems are widely applied, but there is a lack of in-depth understanding of how users actually interact with Auto-ML tools.
- While Auto-ML aims for full automation, completely removing the user may reduce efficiency or fail to adapt to non-standard workflows.
-
Significance: Machine learning holds great potential for addressing societal challenges (e.g., public health, climate change, precision agriculture), but its application is constrained by operational complexity and technical barriers.
-
Research Motivation and Related Work:
- Current Auto-ML research predominantly focuses on prototype tools and user perceptions, without adequately reflecting real-world applications in industrial and academic settings.
- The development of Auto-ML should shift from full automation to supporting human-AI collaboration.
Proposed Solution
-
Proposed Approach:
- Shift the research focus to collaboration between users and machines, emphasizing the cultivation of a human-machine "partnership" rather than removing humans from the loop.
- Propose specific design improvements, such as personalized user interfaces (UI), enhanced transparency, data processing support, and dynamic resource allocation.
-
Innovations:
- Conduct in-depth interviews with 16 experienced Auto-ML users to comprehensively understand their workflows and tool requirements.
- Provide design recommendations grounded in real-world practices to achieve more efficient collaboration with Auto-ML tools.
-
Implementation Steps and Key Techniques:
- Semi-structured interviews to investigate user workflows and perceptions of Auto-ML usage.
- Use qualitative data analysis tools (e.g., Dedoose) to summarize user needs and patterns.
- Propose recommendations to better support user experience and human-in-the-loop interaction design.
Research Outcomes
-
Specific Findings:
- Key Insights:
- Human involvement remains indispensable in Auto-ML workflows, particularly in data preprocessing and ensuring model safety.
- User satisfaction with Auto-ML centers on ease of use and efficiency, but there is dissatisfaction with transparency and customization.
- Design Recommendations:
- Introduce multi-modal UI designs to cater to users with varying levels of experience.
- Provide real-time iterative interaction features, enabling users to dynamically adjust model training.
- Support elastic serverless computing for high computational workloads.
- Key Insights:
-
Advantages:
- Effectively combines human expertise with the automation capabilities of Auto-ML tools, significantly improving efficiency while enhancing user trust and understanding of models.
-
Experimental or Evaluation Results:
- Auto-ML tools perform well in standard workflows but struggle with complex and non-standard use cases.
- Users validate and optimize Auto-ML results through comparisons between manual and automated development.
-
Limitations and Future Directions:
- Limitations:
- Interview samples lack sufficient representation in terms of gender and domain, e.g., low proportion of female participants.
- The nuanced relationship between Auto-ML transparency and user trust was not deeply explored.
- Future Directions:
- Develop dynamic adaptive interfaces based on user skills and mental models.
- Build end-to-end integrated platforms covering the entire workflow from data preprocessing to model deployment.
- Explore automation support for more complex models (e.g., time series, unsupervised learning).
- Limitations:
Through this study, the authors advocate for a shift from full automation to a hybrid model emphasizing human-AI co-creation, providing valuable insights and design guidance for the future development of Auto-ML.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
Research Questions
3- What typical challenges do users encounter when using automated machine learning (Auto-ML) tools in practice?Category: Coding Assistants and Multi-Turn Code SupportSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How can design improvements enhance efficiency and experience of user collaboration with Auto-ML tools?Category: Coding Assistants and Multi-Turn Code SupportSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- Which specific features and interface designs support users' dynamic interaction and personalization needs in Auto-ML tasks?Category: Coding Assistants and Multi-Turn Code SupportSimilar questionsarrow_forward
Practical Problems
1- Non-technical experts struggle to efficiently use complex machine learning tools.Category: Coding Assistants and Multi-Turn Code SupportSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 60%
How Do Data Analysts Respond to AI Assistance? A Wizard-of-Oz Study
CHI '24· Human-LLM Collaboration +1
- 60%
The Role of Initial Acceptance Attitudes Toward AI Decisions in Algorithmic Recourse
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
The Amplifying Effect of Explainability in AI-assisted Decision-making in Groups
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
Underspecified Human Decision Experiments Considered Harmful
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 60%
Guided Reflection in AI-Assisted Decision-Making: Effects on AI Overreliance and Decision Accuracy
CHI '26· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +1
- 60%
Understanding the Effects of AI-Assisted Critical Thinking on Human-AI Decision Making
CHI '26· AI-Assisted Decision-Making & Automation +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)