Towards “Avatar-Friendly” 3D Manipulation Techniques: Bridging the Gap Between Sense of Embodiment and Interaction in Virtual Reality
Full-Body Interaction & Embodied InputIdentity & Avatars in XR
Title of the Paper
Towards “Avatar-Friendly” 3D Manipulation Techniques: Bridging the Gap Between Sense of Embodiment and Interaction in Virtual Reality
Paper Information
- Subject Area: User interaction and avatar manipulation techniques in virtual reality (VR)
- Keywords: Virtual reality, avatars, interaction, sense of embodiment, design guidelines
Research Background and Issues
- Problems or Challenges:
- Current 3D object manipulation techniques in VR face multiple design challenges introduced by user avatars.
- How to balance user operational efficiency with the sense of embodiment remains an unresolved issue.
- The impact of avatars on user interaction with virtual environments and self-perception requires further exploration.
- Significance of the Research:
- The increasing application of VR technology, particularly in social applications involving avatars, highlights the importance of user experience and cognitive performance.
- Understanding the interaction between the sense of embodiment and manipulation techniques can promote more efficient and user-friendly VR interaction designs.
- Motivation and Related Work:
- This paper extends the cognitive concept review of avatar usage by Seinfeld et al. and proposes new guidelines based on specific 3D manipulation task designs.
- It draws from domain surveys on 3D object manipulation techniques (e.g., the work of Mendes et al.) and attempts to improve current techniques and develop new ones.
Proposed Solution
- Proposed Solution:
- The paper presents design principles for creating "avatar-friendly" manipulation techniques through a specialized analysis of how avatars affect manipulation tasks and how manipulation technique design impacts the user's sense of embodiment.
- The analysis focuses on aspects such as avatar appearance, control mechanisms of manipulation techniques, and feedback design, aiming to find methods that ensure both operational efficiency and the preservation of the sense of embodiment. A series of design guidelines are proposed.
- Innovations:
- Combines avatar design with 3D manipulation technique design, systematically proposing design guidelines for manipulation techniques that consider the user's sense of embodiment for the first time.
- Explores how design choices in specific environments for avatar-friendly manipulation techniques influence perception and interaction performance.
- Implementation Steps and Techniques:
- Analyzes avatar performance in 3D manipulation tasks from two perspectives: how avatars affect user operational performance and how manipulation techniques influence the user's perception of the avatar.
- Proposes three key design domains: input devices, control and mapping, and feedback, with corresponding guidelines for further optimization.
- Delves into specific issues in 3D tasks (e.g., remote manipulation, virtual grasping) and proposes corresponding solutions and research directions.
Research Outcomes
- Specific Outcomes:
- Proposed 12 design guidelines for creating avatar-friendly 3D manipulation techniques, covering three major domains: input devices, control and mapping, and system feedback.
- Identified seven research directions to address knowledge gaps in the literature regarding avatar and manipulation technique design.
- Analyzed and clarified the impact of avatars on manipulation tasks and user experience, while providing practical design recommendations and experimental data support.
- Comparative Advantages:
- Provides a novel design standard for practitioners by combining the perspectives of embodiment and performance optimization, rather than relying solely on traditional performance metrics.
- Through detailed interim analysis, suggests new possibilities for interaction design that balance efficiency and immersion.
- Experimental and Evaluation Results:
- Some of the proposed guidelines are supported by experiments in the literature, but the paper highlights areas requiring further validation (e.g., the impact of manipulation distortion on avatar perception, the role of multimodal feedback).
- Limitations and Future Directions:
- Not all design guidelines have been fully validated, and future research is recommended to expand on these.
- Proposed research directions require additional experimental data, such as the combined effects of different input devices and avatar types.
- Encourages deeper evaluation of avatar impacts in manipulation techniques, such as using EEG to capture the sense of embodiment.
Through comprehensive analysis and design guidelines, this paper aims to provide a more complete and practical perspective and methodology for interaction design in virtual reality.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
help
Research Questions
3- How can 3D manipulation techniques be designed to balance operational efficiency and presence (bodily ownership) afforded by avatars?Category: Virtual Avatar Design and Embodied PresenceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How do avatar design (appearance, control mechanism, feedback design) affect users' performance and self-perception in virtual environments?Category: Virtual Avatar Design and Embodied PresenceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- How are remote manipulation and virtual grasping tasks in VR affected by avatar performance and design?Category: Virtual Avatar Design and Embodied PresenceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
lightbulb
Practical Problems
1- Avatar design in VR may reduce interaction efficiency or interfere with user experience.Category: Virtual Avatar Design and Embodied PresenceSimilar questionsarrow_forward
- 100%
Iteratively Adapting Avatars using Task-Integrated Optimisation
UIST '20· Full-Body Interaction & Embodied Input +1
- 67%
The Impact of Avatar Completeness on Embodiment and the Detectability of Hand Redirection in Virtual Reality
CHI '24· Force Feedback & Pseudo-Haptic Weight +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)
Quick Actions
AdRecommended
Learn AI Coding at CodeNow
open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445379
At a Glance
fact_checkPaper Snapshot
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2021
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
4 authors
sell
Subtopics
Full-Body Interaction & Embodied Input, Identity & Avatars in XR
work
Professions
—
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
2 related papers