Title of the Paper

Exploring Asymmetric Role Design in Mixed-Ability Games

Paper Information

  • Subject Area: Game Accessibility, Mixed-Ability Interaction Design, Multisensory Game Environments
  • Keywords: Game Accessibility, Visual Impairment, Mixed-Ability, Social Gaming, Inclusivity, Asymmetric Roles, Interaction Design, Audio Games, Equal Experience, Meaningful Challenges

Research Background and Problem Statement

  • Identified Issues or Challenges:

    • Digital games are often designed for a single type of player, lacking support for specific groups such as those with visual impairments.
    • Individuals with visual impairments are often limited to audio games and cannot participate in mainstream multiplayer games with sighted players, leading to community isolation.
    • Game design efforts to achieve accessibility often simplify the experience, which can result in unbalanced gameplay or a lack of engagement for players.
  • Importance of the Problem:

    • Mixed-ability gaming scenarios are crucial for social inclusion and accessible design, as they help mitigate the limitations caused by ability differences, reduce barriers, and promote social integration.
  • Research Motivation and Related Work:

    • Existing research on games for visually impaired players primarily focuses on single-player scenarios or retrofitting mainstream games, the latter of which involves significant modifications with limited effectiveness.
    • Drawing inspiration from asymmetric game mechanics (e.g., differences in roles, goals, or information) that enhance team collaboration and social connection, the authors propose a novel approach to incorporate ability-based asymmetry into mixed-ability games.

Proposed Solution

  • Proposed Solution by the Authors:

    • The authors designed two cooperative game prototypes with asymmetric roles: Rescue: Under Pressure and Rescue: Mayday.
    • In each game, roles are divided into two complementary types: one focusing on visual tasks (e.g., map navigation and object manipulation) and the other on auditory tasks (e.g., environmental awareness and decision-making based on audio cues).
    • The interdependence between roles addresses the challenge of "collaboration limitations due to visual differences" while ensuring equality in role tasks.
  • Innovative Aspects:

    • The study redefines the mixed-ability gaming experience by proposing that "inclusivity arises from designed asymmetry rather than mere equalization."
    • By integrating asymmetric mechanics and ability-based design, the games create an equal and challenging space for players with different abilities.
  • Implementation Steps and Key Technologies:

    1. Game Design:
      • The games were designed using the three-layer model (mechanics, dynamics, aesthetics) to ensure tight integration of role interdependence and ability-based collaboration.
      • Key tasks were matched to player abilities, such as visual challenges (navigation, exploration) and auditory challenges (audio feedback analysis).
    2. Technical Implementation:
      • The games were developed using Unity, offering audio and keyboard accessibility options, along with interfaces specifically designed for visually impaired players.
    3. User Research:
      • Remote user studies were conducted to evaluate the impact of the games on players with mixed visual abilities, using quantitative questionnaires (UPEQ) and qualitative interviews.

Research Findings

  • Key Findings:

    • Game testing revealed that the asymmetric role tasks designed for visual and auditory abilities did not make players feel limited by their abilities; instead, they fostered mutual appreciation of each other's strengths during collaboration.
    • The prototypes provided equal participation opportunities for mixed-ability players, enhancing social interaction.
    • Players showed strong interest in the challenges presented by the games, although some participants expressed a desire for more diverse game content.
  • Advantages:

    • Compared to existing accessible games, this design effectively balances collaboration and contribution among players with different abilities.
    • The role tasks ensured fairness in task allocation while fostering strong interdependence, enhancing the sense of collaboration.
  • Experimental or Evaluation Results:

    • Overall, players rated their experiences in both games highly, with Rescue: Under Pressure receiving slightly higher ratings than Rescue: Mayday.
    • Regardless of player group (visually impaired or sighted), participants reported high levels of engagement, autonomy, and competence.
  • Limitations and Future Directions:

    • Limitations:
      • The game design is specifically tailored for mixed-ability scenarios and does not address the independent gaming needs of visually impaired users.
      • Both games are early prototypes, and their content and mechanics may not sustain long-term player engagement.
    • Future Directions:
      • Expand role task mechanisms to support more diverse interaction forms, such as multiplayer modes or non-mixed-ability scenarios.
      • Broaden the scope to consider other ability differences (e.g., auditory or motor impairments) to provide more inclusive designs.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/47332/2021

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445494
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2021
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
6 authors
sell
Subtopics
Universal & Inclusive Design, Serious & Functional Games, Game Accessibility
work
Professions
—
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers