Estimating Touch Force with Barometric Pressure Sensors
Authors
Finger pressure offers a new dimension for touch interaction, where input is defined by its spatial position and orthogonal force. However, the limited availability and complexity of integrated force-sensing hardware in mobile devices is a barrier to exploring this design space. This paper presents a synthesis of two features in recent mobile devices – a barometric sensor (pressure altimeter) and ingress protection – to sense a user's touch force. When a user applies force to a device's display, it flexes inward and causes an increase in atmospheric pressure within the sealed chassis. This increase in pressure can be sensed by the device's internal barometer. However, this change is uncontrolled and requires a calibration model to map atmospheric pressure to touch force. This paper derives such a model and demonstrates its viability on four commercially-available devices (including two with dedicated force sensors). The results show this method is sensitive to forces of less than 1 N, and is comparable to dedicated force sensors.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 60%
Jetto: Using Lateral Force Feedback for Smartwatch Interactions
CHI '18· Force Feedback & Pseudo-Haptic Weight +1
- 60%
ForceRay: Extending Thumb Reach via Force Input Stabilizes Device Grip for Mobile Touch Input
CHI '19· Force Feedback & Pseudo-Haptic Weight +1
- 60%
Haptic Representation Method for Material Properties utilizing Pseudo-weight Shifting
CHI '26· Force Feedback & Pseudo-Haptic Weight +1
- 60%
Self-Distillation Based Multi-task Learning Model for Stylus Input Latency Compensation
MobileHCI '25· Force Feedback & Pseudo-Haptic Weight +1
- 60%
Optimal Control for Electromagnetic Haptic Guidance Systems
UIST '20· Head-Up Display (HUD) & Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) +1
- 60%
Augmenting Physical Buttons with Vibrotactile Feedback for Programmable Feels
UIST '20· Vibrotactile Feedback & Skin Stimulation +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)