Evaluation beyond Usability: Validating Sustainable HCI Research
Authors
The evaluation of research artefacts is an important step to validate research contributions. Sub-disciplines of HCI often pursue primary goals other than usability, such as Sustainable HCI (SHCI), HCI for development, or health and wellbeing. For such disciplines, established evaluation methods are not always appropriate or sufficient, and new conventions for identifying, discussing, and justifying suitable evaluation methods need to be established. In this paper, we revisit the purpose and goals of evaluation in HCI and SHCI, and elicit five key elements that can provide guidance to identifying evaluation methods for SHCI research. Our essay is meant as a starting point for discussing current and improving future evaluation practice in SHCI; we also believe it holds value for other subdisciplines in HCI that encounter similar challenges while evaluating their research.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 75%
Have We Taken On Too Much?: A Critical Review of the Sustainable HCI Landscape
CHI '22· Sustainable HCI +1
- 75%
A Critical Analysis of Machine Learning Eco-feedback Tools through the Lens of Sustainable HCI
CHI '25· Sustainable HCI +1
- 75%
Untangling Cables: A Case Study of the Life & Afterlife of Digital Devices in Academic Research
DIS '24· Sustainable HCI +1
- 67%
Sustainable Innovation in Practice: Documenting the Processes, Methods and Perspectives of Low-Tech Designers
DIS '25· Sustainable HCI +1
- 60%
From Exploration to End of Life: Unpacking Sustainability in Physicalization Practices
CHI '24· Data Physicalization +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)