The evaluation of research artefacts is an important step to validate research contributions. Sub-disciplines of HCI often pursue primary goals other than usability, such as Sustainable HCI (SHCI), HCI for development, or health and wellbeing. For such disciplines, established evaluation methods are not always appropriate or sufficient, and new conventions for identifying, discussing, and justifying suitable evaluation methods need to be established. In this paper, we revisit the purpose and goals of evaluation in HCI and SHCI, and elicit five key elements that can provide guidance to identifying evaluation methods for SHCI research. Our essay is meant as a starting point for discussing current and improving future evaluation practice in SHCI; we also believe it holds value for other subdisciplines in HCI that encounter similar challenges while evaluating their research.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/4095/2018

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2018
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
7 authors
sell
Subtopics
Sustainable HCI, Ecological Design & Green Computing
work
Professions
HCI Researchers
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
5 related papers