Improving User Confidence in Concept Maps: Exploring Data Driven Explanations
Authors
Automated tools are increasingly being used to generate highly engaging concept maps as an aid to strategic planning and other decision-making tasks. Unless stakeholders can understand the principles of the underlying layout process, however, we have found that they lack confidence and are therefore reluctant to use these maps. In this paper, we present a qualitative study exploring the effect on users' confidence of using data-driven explanation mechanisms, by conducting in-depth scenario-based interviews with ten participants. To provide diversity in stimulus and approach we use two explanation mechanisms based on projection and agglomerative layout methods. The themes exposed in our results indicate that the data-driven explanations improved user confidence in several ways, and that process clarity and layout density also affected users' views of the credibility of the concept maps. We discuss how these factors can increase uptake of automated tools and affect user confidence.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 80%
Explanations as Mechanisms for Supporting Algorithmic Transparency
CHI '18· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 75%
From Philosophy to Interfaces: an Explanatory Method and a Tool Inspired by Achinstein’s Theory of Explanation
IUI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 75%
Visual, textual or hybrid: the effect of user experience on different explanations
IUI '21· Explainable AI (XAI) +1
- 75%
I Think I Get Your Point, AI! The Illusion of Explanatory Depth in Explainable AI
IUI '21· Explainable AI (XAI)
- 67%
“Trust Us”: Mobile Phone Use Patterns Can Predict Individual Trust Propensity
CHI '18· Human-LLM Collaboration +2
- 67%
Evaluating the Effect of Feedback from Different Computer Vision Processing Stages: A Comparative Lab Study
CHI '19· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
RELIC: Investigating Large Language Model Responses using Self-Consistency
CHI '24· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
Do Expressions Change Decisions? Exploring the Impact of AI's Explanation Tone on Decision-Making
CHI '25· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
Red Teaming LLMs as Socio-Technical Practice: From Exploration and Data Creation to Evaluation
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
- 67%
Comparables XAI: Faithful Example-based AI Explanations with Counterfactual Trace Adjustments
CHI '26· Explainable AI (XAI) +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)