Morphic: Auto-Personalization on a Global Scale
Authors
Users frequently have trouble finding and changing technology settings, even when adjusting those settings to personalize their technology devices may significantly improve their user experience. This paper describes the Morphic project, a cloud-based auto-personalization tool. Primarily designed for improving accessibility, the auto-personalization in Morphic may also help a broader audience. This paper describes: 1) the technical infrastructure needed to support cloud-based auto-personalization, 2) the interaction design approaches necessary to support users during the personalization of their settings, and 3) which settings and modifications have been most frequently used. This paper presents the evolution of the Morphic project, the building of the infrastructure, the formative evaluation of various interaction design approaches (NFC cards, physical keypads, on-screen buttons, and menus), and implications for researchers and developers. It also includes preliminary findings from six technology probes.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 75%
Understanding Everyday Experiences of Reminiscence for People with Blindness: Practices, Tensions and Probing New Design Possibilities
CHI '21· Visual Impairment Technologies (Screen Readers, Tactile Graphics, Braille) +1
- 75%
Accessibility Barriers, Conflicts and Repairs: Understanding the Experience of Professionals with Disabilities in Hybrid Meetings
CHI '23· Universal & Inclusive Design +1
- 60%
Towards Inclusive Avatars: Disability Representation in Avatar Platforms
CHI '23· Identity & Avatars in XR +2
- 60%
So I Can Feel Normal: Participatory Design for Accessible Social Media for Individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury
CHI '23· Cognitive Impairment & Neurodiversity (Autism, ADHD, Dyslexia) +2
- 60%
Inclusive Avatar Guidelines for People with Disabilities: Supporting Disability Representation in Social Virtual Reality
CHI '25· Identity & Avatars in XR +2
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)