Examining the Adoption and Abandonment of Security, Privacy, and Identity Theft Protection Practices

Honorable Mention
Privacy by Design & User ControlPasswords & AuthenticationPrivacy Perception & Decision-Making

Users struggle to adhere to expert-recommended security and privacy practices. While prior work has studied initial adoption of such practices, little is known about the subsequent implementation and abandonment. We conducted an online survey (n=902) examining the adoption and abandonment of 30 commonly recommended practices. Security practices were more widely adopted than privacy and identity theft protection practices. Manual and fully automatic practices were more widely adopted than practices requiring recurring user interaction. Participants' gender, education, technical background, and prior negative experience are correlated with their levels of adoption. Furthermore, practices were abandoned when they were perceived as low-value, inconvenient, or when users overrode them with subjective judgment. We discuss how security, privacy, and identity theft protection recommendations and tools can be better aligned with user needs.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/31862/2020

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376570
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2020
emoji_events
Award
Honorable Mention
group
Authors
6 authors
sell
Subtopics
Privacy by Design & User Control, Passwords & Authentication, Privacy Perception & Decision-Making
work
Professions
—
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
10 related papers