Interpreting the Diversity in Subjective Judgments

Algorithmic Fairness & BiasTechnology Ethics & Critical HCIComputational Methods in HCIHCI ResearchersCognitive ScientistsStatisticians & Data Scientists

In a CHI paper from 10 years ago, entitled "Accounting for Diversity in Subjective Judgments", an interesting dichotomy was reported between, on the one side, the increased use of idiosyncratic constructs when judging the user experience of diverse products and, on the other hand, the statistical methods available to analyze such data. The paper more specifically proposed a method to extract diverse perspectives (called views) from experimental data. The current paper provides three improvements of this existing method by: 1) showing that a little-known approach for clustering attributes, called VARCLUS, can be applied and extended to provide a more optimal algorithm, 2) showing how the VARCLUS method can be applied to perform both within- and across-subject analysis, and 3) providing access to the VARCLUS method by incorporating it in ILLMO, a user-friendly and freely available program for interactive statistics.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/3027/2019

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2019
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
1 authors
sell
Subtopics
Algorithmic Fairness & Bias, Technology Ethics & Critical HCI, Computational Methods in HCI
work
Professions
HCI Researchers, Cognitive Scientists, Statisticians & Data Scientists
article
Content Status
Abstract only
hub
Related Papers
1 related papers