A Qualitative Exploration of Perceptions of Algorithmic Fairness
Authors
Algorithmic systems increasingly shape information people are exposed to as well as influence decisions about employment, finances, and other opportunities. In some cases, algorithmic systems may be more or less favorable to certain groups or individuals, sparking substantial discussion of algorithmic fairness in public policy circles, academia, and the press. We broaden this discussion by exploring how members of potentially affected communities feel about algorithmic fairness. We conducted workshops and interviews with 44 participants from several populations traditionally marginalized by categories of race or class in the United States. While the concept of algorithmic fairness was largely unfamiliar, learning about algorithmic (un)fairness elicited negative feelings that connect to current national discussions about racial injustice and economic inequality. In addition to their concerns about potential harms to themselves and society, participants also indicated that algorithmic fairness (or lack thereof) could substantially affect their trust in a company or product.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
- 67%
Not Just a Preference: Reducing Biased Decision-making on Dating Websites
CHI '22· Algorithmic Fairness & Bias +1
- 67%
What to the Muslim is Internet search: Digital Borders as Barriers to Information
CHI '24· Algorithmic Fairness & Bias +1
- 67%
The Effects of Perceived AI Use On Content Perceptions
CHI '24· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
- 67%
Lay Perceptions of Algorithmic Discrimination in the Context of Systemic Injustice
CHI '25· AI Ethics, Fairness & Accountability +1
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)