More Than Mere Mediators: Examining Determinants of Parental Privacy Management Behaviors

Privacy Perception & Decision-MakingYouth Online Safety & PrivacyChildren & Family IoTFamily CaregiversPrivacy Policy Makers

Paper Title

More Than Mere Mediators: Examining Determinants of Parental Privacy Management Behaviors

Publication Info

  • Topic area: Parental privacy management in digital contexts
  • Keywords: Parental mediation, privacy concern, self-efficacy, technical skills, multi-stakeholder family dynamics, privacy paradox, structural equation modeling, child data disclosure, privacy regulation, HCI interventions

Background and Problem

  • Problem / challenge: Existing research focuses primarily on parental mediation of children’s online behavior, neglecting parents' roles as privacy actors in their own right and the psychological and contextual factors shaping their privacy decisions.
  • Significance: Understanding parental privacy management is critical to safeguarding children’s digital privacy amidst systemic vulnerabilities like unauthorized data collection, tracking, and privacy violations by platforms.
  • Motivation and related work: Previous studies have explored parental mediation strategies but lack explanatory models linking modifiable factors (e.g., privacy concern, self-efficacy) to protective behaviors. This paper addresses these gaps by examining parental privacy management behaviors within multi-stakeholder family contexts.

Solution

  • Proposed approach: Development of a psychologically grounded model of parental privacy management, integrating Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and Protection Motivation Theory (PMT).
  • Novelty:
    1. Reconceptualizes parents as active privacy actors within multi-stakeholder networks.
    2. Identifies modifiable predictors (e.g., privacy concern, self-efficacy, technical skills) of parental privacy management behaviors.
    3. Challenges the generalizability of the privacy paradox in parental contexts.
    4. Provides design-relevant insights for interventions and systems supporting parental privacy competence.
  • Procedure and key techniques:
    • Conducted a survey of 1,000 German parents.
    • Applied Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) to analyze relationships between internal factors (e.g., privacy concern, self-efficacy) and parental privacy behaviors (child mediation, data disclosure regulation, regulation of others).

Results

  • Concrete findings:
    • Privacy concern predicts all three parental privacy management behaviors: child mediation (β = 0.169, p < 0.001), regulation of others (β = 0.108, p = 0.002), and data disclosure (β = 0.123, p < 0.001).
    • Self-efficacy is a stronger predictor than privacy concern, influencing child mediation (β = 0.223, p < 0.001), regulation of others (β = 0.188, p < 0.001), and data disclosure (β = 0.161, p < 0.001).
    • Technical privacy skills are the strongest antecedent of self-efficacy (β = 0.560, p < 0.001).
  • Advantage over baselines: Challenges the privacy paradox by showing that parental concern reliably translates into protective behaviors in family contexts, unlike in individual privacy settings.
  • Experiments / evaluation:
    • Survey of 1,000 parents in Germany (balanced by child age and parental gender).
    • Constructs measured using validated scales and newly developed items.
    • Multi-group analyses revealed demographic differences (e.g., gender, education).
  • Limitations and future work:
    • Relied on self-reported behaviors, which may be subject to bias.
    • Did not measure child outcomes resulting from parental mediation.
    • Simplified theoretical mechanisms and treated parental mediation as a unified construct.
    • Future research should explore cultural differences, reciprocal feedback loops, and intervention validation.

Summary

This study investigates parental privacy management behaviors, emphasizing parents' roles as privacy actors within multi-stakeholder family contexts. It finds that privacy concern and self-efficacy are key predictors of protective actions, with self-efficacy emerging as the stronger driver. Technical privacy skills significantly enhance self-efficacy, underscoring the need for practical, skills-based interventions. The findings challenge the privacy paradox in parental contexts, suggesting that concern reliably translates into action when focused on children’s privacy. Practical implications include designing interventions that prioritize capability-building, gender-sensitive training, and peer-to-peer learning, alongside systems that support multi-stakeholder privacy management.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/223174/2026

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3790856
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2026
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
3 authors
sell
Subtopics
Privacy Perception & Decision-Making, Youth Online Safety & Privacy, Children & Family IoT
work
Professions
Family Caregivers, Privacy Policy Makers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
0 related papers