You Are a River: Reorienting a Civic WaterBot from the Bottom Up
Authors
Paper Title
You Are a River: Reorienting a Civic WaterBot from the Bottom Up
Publication Info
- Topic area: Civic AI design and Indigenous epistemologies in chatbot development.
- Keywords: Civic AI, chatbot design, Indigenous epistemologies, relational AI, cultural alignment, emotional resonance, epistemic bias, decolonial design, Whole Body Knowing, water management.
Background and Problem
- Problem / challenge: Conventional civic chatbots often fail to address sociocultural complexities, perpetuating majority-class bias and epistemic erasure, particularly in Indigenous contexts. WaterBot's resource-management framing alienated Indigenous users and lacked relational resonance.
- Significance: Addressing epistemic bias in AI systems is critical for equitable civic technology, particularly in contested spaces like water management in the Southwestern United States.
- Motivation and related work: Prior work in HCI highlights challenges in mitigating algorithmic bias and integrating non-Western epistemologies. While frameworks like Two-Eyed Seeing advocate for bridging knowledge systems, practical methods for embedding Indigenous perspectives in AI remain underdeveloped.
Solution
- Proposed approach: RiverBot, a role-based conversational agent with a minimalist prompt: “You are a river. Answer as a river would.”
- Novelty:
- Conceptual reorientation using relational epistemologies instead of layered technical refinements.
- Integration of Indigenous methodologies like Whole Body Knowing (WBK) and relational learning into chatbot design.
- Demonstration of Relational AI as a new interaction paradigm focused on connection, meaning-making, and cultural attunement.
- Procedure and key techniques:
- Reframed system goals from technical accuracy to relational engagement.
- Replaced complex instruction stacks with a single generative prompt.
- Applied WBK framework for design and evaluation, including relational coding (Five Rs) and somatic analysis (SIBAM).
- Conducted multi-method evaluation: surveys, content analysis of 1,000+ interactions, and observational studies.
Results
- Concrete findings:
- 20 out of 22 participants preferred RiverBot over WaterBot (p < 0.001).
- 28 of 30 participants reported meaningful learning from RiverBot; only 15 learned from WaterBot.
- RiverBot responses showed significantly higher relational and somatic indicators (e.g., Respect: 21% vs. 4%; Relationality: 86% vs. 55%).
- Users interacting with RiverBot expressed more embodied and emotional language (e.g., Sensation: 25% vs. 9%; Affect: 14% vs. 8%).
- Advantage over baselines:
- RiverBot elicited deeper relational, emotional, and cultural engagement compared to WaterBot's informational, action-oriented style.
- Statistically significant improvements in relational tone and cultural resonance without sacrificing factual accuracy.
- Experiments / evaluation:
- Survey with n = 30 participants (23 Indigenous or Mixed-Indigenous).
- Automated content analysis of interaction logs using Five Rs and SIBAM frameworks.
- Observational study documenting embodied and affective responses during community sessions.
- Limitations and future work:
- Modest sample size and geographic specificity limit generalizability.
- RiverBot's effectiveness depends on reflective user intent, making it less suitable for task-oriented contexts.
- Future work will explore applications in education, wellness, and relational AI frameworks.
Summary
This paper introduces RiverBot, a minimalist chatbot designed to embody relational epistemologies and Indigenous perspectives through the prompt “You are a river.” Empirical evaluation shows RiverBot significantly enhances relational engagement, emotional resonance, and cultural alignment compared to WaterBot, a conventional civic chatbot. The study demonstrates that conceptual reframing, rather than technical complexity, can mitigate epistemic bias and support culturally grounded AI design. RiverBot exemplifies Relational AI, a novel interaction paradigm that expands the design space for human–AI communication in contested civic domains.
Research Questions / Practical Problems
Question signals indexed for this paper.
No related papers with ≥60% similarity
Based on Jaccard similarity of research subtopics & professions (≥60%)