Control in Context: How Smart Home Users Navigate Proxy-based Schemes

Smart Home Interaction DesignSmart Home Privacy & SecurityUI/UX DesignersAI/ML Researchers & Engineers

Paper Title

Control in Context: How Smart Home Users Navigate Proxy-based Schemes

Publication Info

  • Topic area: User behavior and design implications for smart home device control systems.
  • Keywords: Smart home, IoT, proxy-based control, user experience, troubleshooting, control spectrum, HCI, smart device ecosystems, seam practices, centralized control.

Background and Problem

  • Problem / challenge: Existing smart home research often assumes proxy-based control as the primary interaction method, neglecting the dynamic interplay between direct device control and proxy-based schemes. This overlooks real-world user behaviors and troubleshooting practices.
  • Significance: Understanding how users navigate control schemes is essential for designing systems that better align with user preferences, reduce cognitive load, and improve reliability in diverse scenarios.
  • Motivation and related work: Prior studies focused on specific devices, interaction styles, or centralized control systems, often in controlled environments. These approaches fail to capture the complexity of real-world smart home setups, where users blend control methods and adapt to breakdowns.

Solution

  • Proposed approach: A dual-spectrum framework capturing user navigation across the locus of execution (physical to proxy-based control) and seam practices (seam hiding to seam revealing).
  • Novelty:
    1. Empirical insights into how users navigate and combine control schemes in real-world smart homes.
    2. Characterization of troubleshooting workflows and their impact on user trust and preferences.
    3. Identification of tradeoffs between convenience, precision, and cognitive effort in control scheme selection.
    4. Design implications for supporting transitions across control schemes.
  • Procedure and key techniques:
    • Conducted a survey (N = 43 valid responses) and follow-up interviews (N = 8 participants) to explore user preferences, troubleshooting workflows, and perceptions of control schemes.
    • Analyzed data using thematic analysis and open coding to identify recurring themes and user strategies.
    • Developed a dual-spectrum model to contextualize findings and propose actionable design recommendations.

Results

  • Concrete findings:
    • 51% of survey participants used voice commands, 33% used routines, and 18% used content streaming/casting as control methods.
    • Centralized control schemes were favored for managing large-scale setups, while per-brand control offered granularity for specific device configurations.
    • Troubleshooting commonly involved layered strategies, starting with central control and escalating to vendor apps or physical device interaction.
    • Persistent failures led to abandonment of devices or features, highlighting the importance of resilience and fallback options.
  • Advantage over baselines:
    • Demonstrates the importance of supporting transitions across control schemes rather than optimizing for a single method.
    • Highlights user-driven seam practices as critical for troubleshooting and system recovery, which prior research often overlooked.
  • Experiments / evaluation:
    • Survey collected demographic and behavioral data on smart home device usage and control preferences.
    • Interviews provided qualitative insights into user strategies, tradeoffs, and troubleshooting workflows.
    • Data analysis revealed patterns in control scheme navigation and the impact of device failures on user trust and behavior.
  • Limitations and future work:
    • Sample skewed toward tech-savvy users; future studies should include less experienced users and multi-user households.
    • Observational and ethnographic methods could provide richer insights into real-world interactions.
    • Results tied to current technology; future research should explore changes as standards like Matter evolve.

Summary

This paper investigates how smart home users navigate the spectrum of control schemes, from physical device interaction to proxy-based central control, in everyday use and troubleshooting scenarios. Through surveys and interviews, the study reveals that users adapt their strategies dynamically based on convenience, reliability, and task complexity. The findings emphasize the importance of supporting transitions across control schemes and propose a dual-spectrum framework to guide design. Future systems should prioritize transparency, resilience, and user agency to better align with the heterogeneous and evolving nature of smart home ecosystems.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/221906/2026

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3790549
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2026
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
7 authors
sell
Subtopics
Smart Home Interaction Design, Smart Home Privacy & Security
work
Professions
UI/UX Designers, AI/ML Researchers & Engineers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
1 related papers