Exploring Users’ Perspectives on a Solid-Enabled Personal Data Store Enhanced Streaming Service

Algorithmic Transparency & AuditabilityRecommender System UXPrivacy by Design & User ControlSoftware Engineers & DevelopersUI/UX DesignersAI/ML Researchers & EngineersHCI Researchers

Research Background and Issues

  • What problems or challenges did the authors identify?
    Current digital platforms (e.g., Google, Facebook) store and manage user data in a centralized manner, making it difficult for users to control the use of their personal information. This situation has led to several issues: users losing control over their personal data, exacerbated privacy fatigue, and data monopolization by a few large companies. Furthermore, this phenomenon of data silos limits the ability of small or emerging companies to enter the market, shifting competition away from service quality and toward data ownership.

  • Why is this issue important?
    User privacy and data transparency have become urgent issues that need to be addressed, as they not only affect user trust and experience but also determine the fairness of the future digital services market. Additionally, for platforms relying on recommendation systems (e.g., streaming services), the lack of diverse user data limits the potential for personalized services.

  • Research Motivation and Related Work
    Solid (SOcial LInked Data) is a specification proposed by Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web, aimed at helping users regain data ownership through Personal Data Stores (PDS) and enabling users to share data across platforms. This technology promises to enhance data transparency and control, thereby reshaping the relationship between users and digital services. However, despite some media companies (e.g., BBC, VRT) exploring its potential, Solid's practical application still faces challenges in implementation and user acceptance. This study seeks to explore the performance of PDS in terms of user behavior and acceptance through a concrete case (streaming services) and provide design recommendations for broader adoption.


Solution

  • What methods or solutions did the authors propose?
    The authors designed a Solid-supported streaming service prototype to strengthen user transparency and control over recommendation algorithms through the integration of Personal Data Stores. The study employed a Research-through-Design (RTD) approach, collecting user perspectives on PDS features and their willingness to share different types of data through expert reviews and focus group discussions.

  • What are the innovative aspects of this solution?

    1. Applying PDS to a real-world scenario (streaming services) to explore the integration of theory and practice.
    2. Using core principles of the Human-Data Interaction (HDI) framework (legibility, agency, and negotiability) to guide prototype design and evaluate user feedback.
    3. Developing methods that allow users to manage data more transparently and autonomously, such as data request pop-ups, a visualized "data dashboard," and controllable personalized recommendations.
  • What are the implementation steps and key technologies used?

    1. Prototype Development and Iteration:

      • Using Figma to create medium-to-high fidelity clickable prototypes, allowing users to simulate logging into a streaming platform and controlling shared data usage.
      • Implementing comprehensive user data management, including data visualization, control over personalized recommendations, and revocation of data permissions.
    2. Expert Evaluation:

      • Recruiting five experts from various fields (UX design, privacy, innovation, etc.) to evaluate the initial prototype and collect improvement suggestions.
    3. Focus Group Studies:

      • Conducting two focus groups (19 participants in total) to explore which features users accept and under what circumstances they are willing to share personal data.
      • Refining feature designs, such as data request granularity and the transparency of personalized recommendation mechanisms, based on discussions and behavioral analysis.

Research Outcomes

  • What specific outcomes were achieved?

    1. Users showed a high level of acceptance for PDS but expressed concerns about security (e.g., fear of hacking) and the feasibility of technical implementation.
    2. Features such as transparency and autonomous control mechanisms received high praise from users (especially clear and concise data requests, personalized options, and permission revocation functionality).
    3. User willingness to share data could be significantly enhanced through stronger brand credibility or by further reducing complexity, such as automated privacy management features.
  • What advantages does it have compared to existing solutions?
    Compared to mainstream streaming services, this solution:

    1. Provides a higher level of data control and transparency (e.g., permission-based data requests and control over personalized recommendations).
    2. Breaks data silos through Solid's decentralized model, allowing users to flexibly migrate their data.
    3. Focuses on rebuilding user trust by enhancing psychological comfort through monitoring and explaining the principles behind recommendation systems.
  • What were the experimental or evaluation results?

    • Data sharing was closely related to user comfort and perceived value. For example, users showed high acceptance for sharing media-related data (e.g., Netflix viewing history) but were cautious about sharing e-commerce or social media behavior data.
    • Focus group participants explicitly stated that the permission revocation feature provided by PDS reduced psychological barriers to data sharing.
    • Users were resistant to certain personalized tags (e.g., "media profile" features), perceiving tagging mechanisms as potentially reinforcing stereotypes and limiting personal choices.
  • Limitations and Future Directions
    Limitations:

    1. This study was based on a virtual prototype, and future research is needed to verify whether user data management behavior in real-world applications aligns with focus group feedback.
    2. Conducted in the context of a government-supported streaming service (VRTMAX), the findings may not fully apply to commercial environments.
    3. Since the Solid ecosystem is still in its early stages, its technical boundaries and challenges for large-scale application require further exploration.

    Future Directions:

    1. Conduct longitudinal studies to examine changes in user behavior after long-term use of PDS.
    2. Explore the adoption of Solid technology in commercial contexts, such as retail, e-commerce, and healthcare.
    3. Refine user interaction models, such as optimizing user control and intervention mechanisms in recommendation systems, to further integrate transparent algorithms with decentralized data management.

This study, guided by practical cases and theoretical continuity, provides valuable directions for future user data management and recommendation service design, defining new research pathways.

Quick Actions

Share

Share this page

ios_share

https://hci.top/en/papers/chi/188846/2025

AdRecommended

Learn AI Coding at CodeNow

open_in_newOpen DOI Link
DOI: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3706598.3713308
At a Glance

Paper Snapshot

fact_check
dataset
Source
CHI
calendar_month
Year
2025
emoji_events
Award
No award tagged
group
Authors
6 authors
sell
Subtopics
Algorithmic Transparency & Auditability, Recommender System UX, Privacy by Design & User Control
work
Professions
Software Engineers & Developers, UI/UX Designers, AI/ML Researchers & Engineers, HCI Researchers
article
Content Status
Full text indexed
hub
Related Papers
2 related papers